Dennis Kneale, CNBC Media & Technology Editor, CNBC (June 21, 2010)
"For almost two decades the U.S. government has kept its meddlesome mudhooks off the Internet, freeing it to spread its kudzu-like tendrils into the global economy. And it worked.
"The FCC took a big step this week to end all of that. For the first time, the Federal Communications Commission proposes using a set of 75-year-old phone regulations to oversee the Net of the 21st century and have a say in the prices that companies like AT&T and Comcast can charge. And set rules for what traffic they must carry. (Comcast is acquiring a 51 percent stake in NBC Universal' CNBC's parent company. The deal is awaiting regulatory approval.)
"Some telecom execs say the FCC's agenda is downright radical. It could thwart high hopes for the wireless Internet...."
The CNBC article/op-ed focuses on the commercial & business aspects of this latest FCC action - naturally enough. The Lemming thinks that folks who like to use the Internet, either as viewers or content providers, should be interested.
Very interested.
The Rules Won't Let You? Re-Define Them
Back to the CNBC piece:"...Two months ago the DC appeals court unanimously agreed: the FCC had no such authority.
"What to do? Make it up!
"To do that, the FCC proposes a nifty little change in definitions. It wants to re-classify the Internet and say it no longer is an 'information service'—which gets a light hand. Now the Net shall be called a 'telecommunications service'—a phone service, basically, that gets subjected (and subjugated) to a lot more government oversight...."
So the bureaucrats on Capitol Hill want to protect the masses from Big Internet? What could possibly go wrong?
See:
- "Yes, it Could be Worse: Venezuela, Interpol, and TV Station Owner"
Another War-on-Terror Blog (June 18, 2010) - "Google, China, Censorship, Compromise: 'Totally Wrong;' or, Not"
(March 23, 2010)
This latest FCC effort isn't censorship: it's more of an attempt to stop 'Big Internet' from setting up more effective, faster, communications channels. For the good of the common citizens, I'm sure - but as a common citizen, I'm not at all convinced that making it harder to upgrade information technology's infrastructure is a good idea.
But then, I'm one of those folks who don't want to be protected from the 'wicked, wicked web' - which the Lemming has said before.
Related posts:
- "Yes, it Could be Worse: Venezuela, Interpol, and TV Station Owner"
Another War-on-Terror Blog (June 18, 2010) - "Google, China, Censorship, Compromise: 'Totally Wrong;' or, Not"
(March 23, 2010) - "Net Neutrality, Comcast, the FCC, Censorship and Freedom"
(January 9, 2010) - "Yogi Yorgesson's 'I Yust Go Nuts At Christmas' and the Hamms Bear"
(December 15, 2009)- Banned from broadcast: arguably, an example of well-intentioned censorship
- "About Google, Change, and News"
(December 6, 2009) - "American Government to Regulate Blogging - It Could Be Worse"
(October 6, 2009) - "Dred Scott, the Slavery Compromise, and Who to Trust"
A Catholic Citizen in America (February 2, 2009) - "Remember Political Correctness? - Superperson, Dicjanetionaries, and an Article in a Processed Tree Carcass"
(January 31, 2009) - "Free Exchange of Ideas, Spam, and Unintended Consequences"
(July 15, 2008) - "YouTube Banned by China: Online Censorship?"
(March 17, 2008) - "Odd Allies: Opposition to Waterboarding and Web Censorship"
Another War-on-Terror Blog (March 9, 2008)
Particularly- The discussion of: conservative Christians and rampant pornography; compassionate liberals and "hate speech" online
- "Google Puts Inner City Press Back on Google News"
(February 20, 2008) - "Censorship, Freedom of Speech, and Blogs: Heads Up!"
(January 17, 2008) - "It Can Happen Here: 'Hate Speech' and Censorship"
(January 12, 2008) - "Censorware in Australia: It's not a Good Idea, It's the Law"
(January 9, 2008) - "European Experts and Web 2.0: Saving the Rabble From Themselves"
(December 22, 2007) - "Filtering, Censorship, and Dealing With It"
(September 14, 2007) - "Fear and Blogging"
(July 30, 2007)
No comments:
Post a Comment