Showing posts with label online community. Show all posts
Showing posts with label online community. Show all posts

Monday, June 27, 2011

Olympic Committee Rules for Social Media: Common Sense; or Signs of a Vast Conspiracy of Space Aliens?

"Olympic Bosses Set Guidelines for Tweeting Athletes"
Erik Malinowski, Playbook, Wired (June 27, 2011)

"The International Olympic Committee has released guidelines on how athletes at the 2012 Summer Olympics in London may engage in social media, an effort clearly designed to avoid the sort of confusion that occurred nearly 18 months ago in Vancouver.

" 'The IOC actively encourages and supports athletes … to take part in "social media" and to post, blog and tweet their experiences,' the guidelines state (.pdf). 'Broadly speaking, the IOC wants people to share their experiences through social media. As a general rule, the IOC encourages all social media and blogging activity at the Olympic Games as long as it is not for commercial and/or advertising purposes.'..."

So far, so good. It's nice to think that the International Olympic Committee can learn. And apply what's been learned.

"...Well, if anything, it should certainly curtail the type of promo-only tweeting we often see from Olympic athletes. But beyond scaling back on this sort of commercialism that could distract from the competitions, IOC officials undoubtedly expect this move to cut down on some of the questions that arose during the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver, British Columbia...."

The Lemming suspects that part of the trouble is that the big shots who get to be on international committees are around the Lemming's age. Nothing wrong with that, by itself. But the Lemming stayed in touch with what 'the help' were doing: quite often by being 'the help,' and that's another topic.

That meant that the Lemming knew how to use a typewriter - a vital skill for 'clerical' types, not so much for success-track executives. Manual typewriters: the Lemming's that old. Being able to type maybe 50 words a minute ('good enough,' barely) gave the Lemming a head start when the Disk Operating System, and computers with stunningly huge internal memory1 came along.

The Lemming's rambled on about this before:

"Olympism?!"

"...IOC honchos are expecting the athletes (as always) to best on their best Twitter behavior.

" 'Postings, blogs and tweets should at all times conform to the Olympic spirit and fundamental principles of Olympism as contained in the Olympic Charter, be dignified and in good taste, and not contain vulgar or obscene words or images,' the rules stipulate...."

The Lemming was not aware that "Olympism" was a word. In context, it's pretty clearly a noun, probably meaning something like 'of or pertaining to the Olympics.' And if it wasn't a word before, it is now. Languages - living ones - change, grow, develop. Someone really should let the folks running France know that. And that's definitely another topic. (Another War-on-Terror Blog (June 6, 2011))

The Olympics, Vast Secret Conspiracies, and the Lemming

Back to that article. Last time. Promise.

"...Additionally, no website URLs will be allowed to contain the words 'Olympic' or 'Olympics' in the primary domain, unless they have been pre-approved by the IOC. And, as before, fans and athletes will not be allowed to post audio or video of any events to Twitter, Facebook or personal blogs...."

The IOC controls what folks can name their domains?! Okay - maybe that's part of what's been getting sorted out, as intellectual property laws and customs are catching up with today's information technology. Well, moving in the right direction. Maybe.

It occurs to the Lemming that the 'no Olympic/Olympics' in domain names may be sort of rough on folks who want to start something online about ancient Greece, or Mount [redacted], or Greco-Roman mythology.

Well, as we say here in Minnesota - it could be worse.

Or - - - maybe Wired let a little-known aspect of the Vast Global Worldwide Conspiracy of International Oligarchic Control ("IOC" doesn't stand for International Olympic Committee, although dupes of the lizard-men think that's so - - -
IOC STANDS FOR INTERNATIONAL OLIGARCHIC CONTROL - WHO ARE
THE REAL RULERS OF EARTH!!!!!!!

They're the ones who killed John Lennon, and put the face on Mars, and faked the moon landing to cover up the real reason that Kennedy was killed: which was so Elvis could elope with Marilyn Monroe, who had been hiding in plain sight disguised as Jackie Kennedy - who couldn't have married Onassis, since he's one of the shape-shifting space-alien lizard-men who really run the world.

You See??!!! IT ALL FITS TOGETHER!!!!!!!!

Maybe the Lemming shouldn't joke about that - somebody might believe it.

Or the lizard-men might be upset.

Or something.

Related posts:
Not-so-related posts:

1 The early hard drives paled in comparison to the later titans - which sometimes could store as much as 30 megabytes of data!

Tuesday, May 3, 2011

Lemming Tracks: Bad News From Sony; and Getting a Grip

Sony is in the news again. Maybe you remember the trouble with Sony Playstation's network service, where:
  • The network went down
  • And stayed down
  • Without explanation
    • Pretty much
Then, like the punchline in a campus coffee shop story, Sony mentioned that mailing address, credit card information, and other personal data for lots of Sony Playstation customers had been stolen - - -

- - - Wait for it - that wasn't the punch line - here it comes - and that Sony would get back to their customers if there was something to be concerned about.

Coming on top of the Toyota SNAFU(s), and the none-too-well-handled communication about TEPCO's Fukushima reactor problems: What happened to Sony might have had someone saying, 'how could it get worse?'

It got worse.

25,000,000 Users Compromised - That's a Lot of Zeroes

"Sony Hacked Again; 25 Million Entertainment Users' Info at Risk"
Game | Life, Wired (May 2, 2011)

"It's bad news piled on top of bad news for Sony.

"Hackers may have stolen the personal information of 24.6 million Sony Online Entertainment users, the company said on Monday. More than 20,000 credit card and bank account numbers were also put at risk. This is in addition to the recent leak of over 70 million accounts from Sony's PlayStation Network and Qriocity services.

" 'We are today advising you that the personal information you provided us in connection with your SOE account may have been stolen in a cyberattack,' Sony wrote in a statement on its website on Monday.

"Sony Online Entertainment is a division of the company that publishes online multiplayer games like the recently released DC Universe Online. Sony turned off all SOE game services Monday after it learned of the intrusion.

"Sony said that the compromised personal information includes customers' names, addresses, e-mail addresses, birth dates, gender, phone numbers, logins and hashed passwords.

"Also at risk are the credit card numbers and expiration dates of 12,700 non-U.S. customers, plus 10,700 direct debit records from customers in Austria, Germany, Netherlands and Spain, containing bank-account numbers, customers' names and addresses. This information was stored in what Sony said was an 'outdated database from 2007.'..."

The good news, from the Lemming's point of view, is that Sony seems to have realized that issues like this won't go away if they're ignored. Also, that folks who like using Sony products - also like to be told when there's trouble.

It's a 'trust' thing, in the Lemming's opinion. Also common sense.

Now, more about what Sony's doing:

"Sony Apologizes, Explains How Hackers Stole PlayStation Personal Data"
Associated Press, via FoxNews.com (May 2, 2011)

"Sony executives bowed in apology Sunday as they explained how hackers took personal data of 77 million accounts on the online PlayStation service, including 10 million credit card accounts that may have been compromised.

" 'We deeply apologize for the inconvenience we have caused,' said Kazuo Hirai, chief of Sony Corp.'s PlayStation video game unit, who was among the three executives who held their heads low for several seconds at the company's Tokyo headquarters in the traditional style of a Japanese apology.

"Hirai said parts of the service would be back this week and that the company would beef up security measures. But he and other executives acknowledged that not enough had been done in security precautions, and promised that the company's network services were under a basic review to prevent a recurrence.

"Hirai said the FBI and other authorities had been contacted to start an investigation into what the company called 'a criminal cyber attack' on Sony's data center in San Diego, Calif.

"Sony said account information, including names, birth dates, email addresses and log-in information, was compromised for players using its PlayStation Network. Hirai asked all users to change their passwords....

The Lemming will be back, later in this post, with someone's advice about online security. As usual, it's mostly just common sense. And the Lemming will get back to that.

Hirari, Sony Corp.'s PlayStation video game unit chief, is in an unenviable position, in the Lemming's opinion. He knows that something went seriously wrong - doesn't know how bad it is, yet - and has decided to open up about what he does, and does not, know. A prudent decision, in the Lemming's opinion.

Back to that article.

"...Hirai reiterated what the company said last week -- that even though it had no direct evidence the data were even taken, it cannot rule out the possibility.

"He said data from 10 million credit cards were believed to be involved, and that Sony still does not know whether information was stolen.

"Sony has added software monitoring and enhanced data protection and encryption as new security measures, he said. The company said it would offer "welcome back" freebies such as complimentary downloads and 30 days of free service around the world to show remorse and appreciation...."
(FoxNews.com)

The situation is bad - and the Lemming is glad that no member of the Lemming's household deals directly with Sony.

Still, it really could be worse. As far as the Lemming's heard, nobody's data has actually been used with criminal intent - or, rather, that we haven't heard about credit card fraud or identity theft coming from this SNAFU.

But, let's keep a happy thought. So far, Sony's started being fairly open about what's happening: and the really sensitive stolen data seems to be somewhat outdated.

Now, about what to do if when your data is stolen:

So Your Data's Stolen? You've Got Company

"You've Been Hacked, Now What?"
John R. Quain, Personal Tech, FoxNews.com (May 3, 2011)

"You're going to get hacked. And no matter how careful you think you are, the truth is there's nothing you can do to stop it.

"Recent events should make it clear to anyone who uses electricity that eventually some one will make off with your personal data -- not from your computer, but from someone else's. While two companies, Apple and Google, have been caught tracking customers and not being exactly forthcoming about it, other major companies, most notably Sony, have been deliberately hacked.

"Sony's network is so seriously compromised, in fact -- including possibly birth dates, credit card numbers, and passwords of customers -- that it's likely to be offline for at least two weeks. And just a few weeks ago, Epsilon, a company that sends out billions of e-mails for companies such as Target, Best Buy, Citigroup, and more admitted it too had been hacked.

"Other breeches are due to human error, lost laptops, and digital misadventures. Worse yet, many online businesses deliberately sell your personal data. Most claim it's for innocuous -- but extremely annoying -- marketing purposes. Others claim that the information is aggregated so they can't pin information to you personally.

"What harm could it do? Quite a bit, it turns out...."

The Lemming was somewhat unimpressed by the author's citing TomTom's 'admission' "that it had sold anonymous traffic and speed data from users to local governments, whose police departments used the information to set up speed traps." Possibly because the Lemming remembers old-school speed traps, where municipalities in effect hid traffic signs and shook down travelers.

Using demographic data to determine where folks beak the law, on average? Heavens, next thing you know, they'll be watching to see if you take stuff out of stores without paying for it.

Sorry about the sarcasm: the Lemming doesn't have much time for the 'I got caught and it's not fair' sort of 'privacy' concerns. And that's almost another topic.

Back to that article:

"...What can you do about it? The first step is acceptance.

" 'People should just assume their personal information is exposed everywhere,' said Tom Oscherwitz, chief privacy officer at ID Analytics, which assesses the fraud risk and creditworthiness of individuals.

"The second step is independence: Don't expect any one to tell you when information about you has been stolen. Businesses aren't always required to divulge a data breach, so to avoid embarrassment, they often don't. One expert told me that of nearly 100 data breeches at U.S. companies so far this year, less than 5 percent have been reported.

"The last step is to complain to companies whenever there's a leak. Business will take notice. Just witness how Facebook has had to backtrack on its privacy settings several times because of the uproar from users.

"Some analysts suggest that letting people opt out -- like those 'do not call' phone lists -- could help solve the problem. But you simply cannot opt out of everything: banks, phone companies, stores, which is where the trouble starts...."

That last point has a crucial phrase in it, in the Lemming's opinion: "could help." It's unlikely - putting it mildly - that any one approach will be the absolutely perfect solution to all online security issues.

On the other hand, the Lemming has been using the 'opt out' option whenever it's offered. Which, along with a pretty good email service (the Lemming uses GoDaddy's email that comes with website hosting packages), seems to have dramatically cut down spam in the inbox. Totally eliminated for all time? No. Cut down, yes.

The Lemming's Notions, For What They're Worth

The Lemming is not a security expert, and makes no claims about the practicality of these ideas. The Lemming accepts no responsibility if you read this. Do not play in traffic.

That should be enough of a disclaimer: but you never know.

Anyway, the Lemming doesn't do all that much when it comes to online security. Not in terms of ultra-sophisticated software and paranoid procedures.

On the other hand, the Lemming does:
  • Have one (1) credit card account
    • Compares the monthly bill with actual purchases
      • Investigates possible discrepancies
  • Does not respond to incoming solicitations
    • Not even that request from the Grand Poobah of Boogabooga
There's a little more to it: but the basic idea is 'KISS' (Keep It Simple, Stupid; or Keep It Stupidly Simple, if you prefer).

Also, the Lemming acts, whenever possible, as if any information left online is written on a postcard - available for anybody who's interested to read.

Blaming 'Them' - or Getting a Grip

Let's see if you can guess who the Lemming thinks is 'really' behind the Sony SNAFU:
  1. Japan
  2. Communists
  3. Big Oil
  4. Space-alien, shape-shifting, lizard-men
  5. Big Cheese
  6. The Jews
  7. Big Peanut
  8. Yankee Imperialism
  9. None of the above
If you guessed "#9, None of the above," you're a perceptive judge of the Lemming. If you guessed "#4 Space-alien, shape-shifting, lizard-men," "#5 Big Cheese," or "#7 Big Peanut," you may be spending more time reading the Lemming's blogs than you should. Or have an awfully good memory.

A little more seriously, the Lemming hasn't run into any of the 'it is the fault of' nonsense that followed Japan's March disaster, and Haiti's earthquake the year before. For which the Lemming is duly grateful.

Every culture, nation, whatever, seems to have a few folks who need to blame someone else for what they don't like. Just who 'they' are varies - a lot - but the basic pattern may be one of those 'universals.'

Finally, the Lemming didn't make up the lizard-men conspiracy theory: but Big Cheese and Big Peanut are, as far as the Lemming knows, originals.

So: if someone tells you that rising gas prices, the national debt, and acne, are all the fault of Big Cheese - you heard it first here.

Somewhat-related posts:
The Lemming, on Japan's earthquake/tsunami/aftermath experience:

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Lemming Tracks: Anonymity, Blogs, and Making a Point

What do the Governor of Louisiana, the next eruption of the Yellowstone caldera, blogging, and anonymity have to do with each other?

Not much, actually. But an anonymous comment on a post in this blog got the Lemming to thinking. It was this post:
A little earlier today that prolific correspondent, Anonymous, left this comment:

"Who is the moron that wrote this article? If you are going to write an article about the volcanic activity in Yellowstone, you should at least know that it is the NW corner of WYOMING...not Colorado. It makes you look stupid!"

Anonymous was right, by the way. That post (or article) had Yellowstone in the northwest corner of Colorado. The Lemming corrected that error, and acknowledged Anonymous' contribution.

Anonymous was also right in asserting that factual errors "make you look stupid."

The Lemming - Unmasked!

I've taken to writing in the third person for this blog, and referring to myself as "the Lemming." Mostly because I think it's fun.

I am not trying to hide my identity. My name and a brief description are in this blog's sidebar, with a link to my Blogger profile.

Since I live in the United States, and don't feel that shape-shifting, space-alien lizard-men are 'really' behind what I don't like - letting folks know my name and a little about me isn't a problem.

Besides, I live in a small town in central Minnesota. I love it here - but in a place like this 'privacy,' in the sense of faceless anonymity, is nearly impossible to maintain. And that's almost another topic.

For the rest of this post, I'm dropping into 'first-person' writing. It's easier, and - well, I'll get to that.

Being Anonymous: Good Reasons

Not everybody lives in America. Most folks don't. Some folks, wherever they live, are afraid that some malevolent force is out to get them.

Sometimes those fears are, in my opinion, unfounded. That's because I don't think that space-alien lizard-men, the Illuminati, or the CIA are trying to control by brain with subliminal messages - or whatever the latest fad in conspiracy theories is.

Maybe I'm wrong about that. But I don't think so. And that's another topic.

Sometimes those fears are, again in my opinion, all too reasonable. Some folks living in Egypt, for example, seem to be trying to end a regime that's made a point of removing folks who won't play the president's way from society. Others in Egypt like things the way they are - and that's yet another topic, for another post.

The point is that folks living in places like Egypt have very good reasons for hiding their identities: if they don't agree with whoever's running the country, and want to express their thoughts. Without dying unexpectedly, or simply disappearing. Egypt's not the only place that's run by opposition-averse leaders. Iran and Burma/Myanmar come to mind as examples. In my opinion, again.

Those links are to my Another War-on-Terror Blog, which is also 'apathetic:' in the sense I've defined for the 'apathetic' Lemming.

Being Anonymous: Not-So-Good Reasons

I think some folks use the (apparent) anonymity of online correspondence as a way of venting spleen without fear of reprisal. It's 'honest,' in the sense of the term used by pop psychologists in the '60s and '70s: but I don't think it's a particularly effective way to communicate.

I rant online occasionally. This post is, in a way, a rant. But - and this is an important distinction, I think - I don't rant anonymously.

If I did, my words would have little or no context. Someone reading them wouldn't know what sort of person had written them.

And that's important. In my opinion.

Not in the sort of 'socioeconomic class distinctions' way that has been - and is - a part of many cultures. I don't think that what a person says is more or less important, based on how much money the person has, or who the person's ancestors were.

I do, however, think that a person's status and experience makes a difference.

For example, someone who has worked as a delivery clerk might reasonably be expected to have more practical knowledge of that occupation than someone who hasn't.

Then there's the possibly-still-contentious matter of whether or not dealing with people for decades brings with it the potential for developing some understanding of how folks behave.
Personal Safety: Important
As I wrote earlier, some folks need to maintain anonymity online - because they live in a part of the world where dissenting opinions are severely sanctioned.
Spitefulness Without Consequences: Not So Important
For someone whose goals are similar to those of a person who throws doo-doo at passing cars - anonymous comments may also be appropriate.

For anyone trying to make a point - and be taken seriously - I think that anonymous comments may not be the best option. Particularly if the comments can be interpreted as being offensive.

I've written about this sort of thing before:

Want People to Take You Seriously? Drop the Attitude

Whatever a person's view on "Afgainistan," the Taliban, and whether the CIA or Al Qaeda represent a greater threat to American citizens, I think it's a good idea to remember a few things:
  • People aren't all alike: We don't all
    • Dress alike
    • Look alike
    • Prefer the same foods
Deal with it.

Since anything online that's written in English may be read by people in over a hundred countries, I think it's a good idea to leave terms like "towelhead" or "ignorant westerner" at home.2
" 'Towelhead,' 'Retard,' and Talking Sense in a Global Society"
Another War-on-Terror Blog (February 24, 2009)
Bottom line?
  • There are nearly 7,000,000,000 people alive today
  • A remarkable fraction of them understand English
    (April 4, 2008)
  • My experience has been that folks don't like having offensive terms hurled at them
    • Generally
      • There are a few who thrive on abuse
        • Still one more topic
It's my considered opinion, as someone who's been dealing with people for over a half-century, that hiding behind a screen and hurling insults isn't the most effective way to make a point.

But that's just my opinion.

Sort-of-related posts:

Monday, February 7, 2011

Lemming Tracks: Egypt, Wael Ghonim, and the Information Age

"Google executive Ghonim released in Egypt: report"
Edition: US, Reuters (February 7, 2011)

"A Google Inc executive who had gone missing in Egypt was released on Monday and was on his way to Tahrir Square, the center of two weeks of anti-government demonstrations, Al Arabiya television reported.

"The station did not give details, but Orascom Telecom Chairman Naguib Sawiris said on Sunday authorities promised him Wael Ghonim, Google's head of marketing for the Middle East and North Africa, would be freed.

"Google said last week Ghonim had not been seen since January 27 and began a public search for him, giving out a telephone number for information about him.

"Activists said Ghonim had been involved in founding 'We are all Khaled Said,' an anti-torture Facebook group named after an activist who rights groups said was beaten to death by police in the port city of Alexandria. Two officers now face trial...."

The Lemming's discussed - ranted? - about what's happening in Egypt quite a bit lately. Part of the explanation is in yesterday's post about Wael Ghonim and the Information Age.

Ghonim, Egypt, and All That

Looks like the Google executive is free - and alive.

Hats off to whoever made the decision to release him - although not snatching Ghonim in the first place would have been smarter.

Maybe, of course, he kidnapped himself. To embarrass Egypt's President Mubarak. The Lemming doesn't think that's very likely. Mubarak and his people have been doing a pretty good job of besmirching their reputation - and don't seem to need any help. In the Lemming's opinion.

Although Wael Ghonim being (apparently) alive and free is good news for Ghonim, his friends and family, and folks who are trying to turn Egypt around: The Lemming isn't entirely sure that it's all that important in the 'big picture.'

The Lemming isn't one of those folks who think that individuals aren't important, and that all that 'really' exists are economic classes and/or ethnic groups. Benjamin Franklin, for example, put his stamp on a fair percentage of the politics, culture, and technology of 18th century America.

One Person Can Make a Difference

Wael Ghonim may be one of the pivotal players in changing Egypt from an old-fashioned autocracy with a permanent president, into part of the Information Age's global culture.

But, in the Lemming's opinion, change would have happened anyway. Maybe later - but inevitably. Since Wael Ghonim and others are acting now, dissent in Egypt is taking a particular form.

The Lemming hopes that Ghonim and others use their influence to reform Egypt into a nation that's not run by control freaks. Or, on a more positive note, that allows folks to disagree with whoever's in charge - without disappearing.

Change Happens - We Deal With It, or Get Dealt With

The Lemming's discussed change on geological and cosmic time scales quite a bit in this blog:
Let's put it this way: There's a reason why you won't find a recipe calling for fresh trilobite. Change happens.

Mubarak's Wake-Up Call: It's Not 1981 Any More

President Mubarak was elected in 1981. There are plausible claims that he's arranged election rules that pretty much guaranteed his reelections ever since.

Can't say that the Lemming blames Mubarak, in a way: It's nice to have a regular job with steady pay.

On the other hand, the Lemming learned in each new job - and the Lemming didn't hang on to control of a country for almost three decades. And mismanage the place, apparently.

The Best Form of Government - Is One That Works

Someone leading a country for decades isn't, in the Lemming's opinion, a bad idea by itself. Provided that the leader is competent.

And has the good sense to pay attention to the folks he or she is governing.

Mubarak and his party don't seem to have been doing that.

That's a very bad idea, in the Lemming's opinion: because complaints, as annoying as they can be, let leaders know that something may not be working as it should.

And it's easier - again, in the Lemming's opinion - to let folks complain, and then check out what's happening, than to constantly monitor a system for glitches.

The 'Good Old Days' - Weren't

Back in the 'good old days' before the Information Age, someone like Mubarak might have been able to get away with ignoring reasonable complaints. For the autocrat's lifetime, anyway.

The folks who had better ideas than the president could communicate with their neighbors, and maybe even print pamphlets and write letters. The American Revolution got started that way - but England was, as the Lemming recalls, distracted at the time: and that's another topic, almost.

In a place like Egypt, back in 1981, a 'troublemaker' like Wael Ghonim could be dealt with by snatching him and either holding him in a cell somewhere: or simply killing him and quietly disposing of the body.

That approach can be tried today: but state-run newspapers, radio, and television aren't the only way folks can get - and share - information. Even in places like Egypt or Iran. (remember Neda Agha Soltan - Another War-on-Terror Blog (June 26, 2009))

Between video cameras in cell phones, voice-to-text software, and the Internet, it's getting downright difficult to keep 'the masses' from finding out what's going on in the rest of the world - and keep them from updating the rest of us.

The Lemming doesn't mind the 'divisive,' 'chaotic,' sort of global culture that we're getting. Partly, perhaps, because the Lemming hasn't been on the same page as 'the establishment' for a very, very long time.

Partly, perhaps, because the Lemming thinks it's a good idea for folks to be able to speak their minds - and live.

Sort-of-related posts:
The Lemming on Freedom of Speech and Other Untidy Ideas

Friday, February 4, 2011

Ersatz Dating Site: 250,000 Facebook Profiles Copied Without Permission

" 'Dating' Site Imports 250,000 Facebook Profiles, Without Permission"
Ryan Singel, Epicenter, Wired (February 3, 2011)

"How does a unknown dating site, with the absurd intention of destroying Facebook, launch with 250,000 member profiles on the first day?

"Simple.

"You scrape data from Facebook.

"At least, that's the approach taken by two provocateurs who launched Lovely-Faces.com this week, with profiles — names, locations and photos — scraped from publicly accessible Facebook pages. The site categorizes these unwitting volunteers into personality types, using a facial recognition algorithm, so you can search for someone in your general area who is 'easy going,' 'smug' or 'sly.'

"Or you can just search on people's real names.

"The duo behind the site say it's art, not commerce.

"In what seems to be liberal-arts-grad-schoolese, Paolo Cirio, a media artist, and Alessandro Ludovico, media critic and editor in chief of Neural magazine, explain why they made the site...."

You'll have to read the Epicenter article, to learn what the (artists?) said.

Back to the article:

"..Cirio and Ludovic say they will take down a user's profile, if a person asks and the site doesn't have any indication they are actually trying to make any money. Instead, it's part of a series of prank sites, the first two of which aimed at Google and Amazon, intended to make people think more about data in the age of internet behemoths...."

Okay: So it's a prank. A sort of joke. The Lemming's willing to believe that. Odds are that it'll do no real harm, apart from giving a few 'privacy' folks conniptions.

On the other hand, someone with - ah, issues - might not realize that Lovely-Faces.com is a sophisticated artistic prank. American 'stalker' laws got passed for a reason - and the Lemming sincerely hopes that doesn't happen to any of the quarter-million folks who got Shanghaied into this little joke.

The Lemming isn't too worried about hordes of adoring, lovesick admirers flocking toward the snowbound central Minnesota town the Lemming calls home. That's a photo of the Lemming, taken recently.

It's anyone's guess, what that "facial recognition algorithm" would come up with as a short-phrase character description, given that face. The Lemming put a photo like that in a 'what celebrity do you look like' website once - and Vivian Hsu was in my list of lookalikes. (April 24, 2008) It's the eyes that did it, most likely. Which is an almost entirely different topic.

The Lemming has no plans to see if that pushing-60 fellow made it into Alessandro and Paolo's ersatz dating site. There are more important things on the Lemming's to-do list. Like washing dishes.

Monday, January 31, 2011

Google, Twitter Launch Workaround for Egypt's People

"Google launches Twitter workaround for Egypt"
Edition: U.S., Reuters (January 31, 2011)

"Google Inc launched a special service to allow people in Egypt to send Twitter messages by dialing a phone number and leaving a voicemail, as Internet access continues to be cut off in the country amid anti-government protests.

" 'Like many people we've been glued to the news unfolding in Egypt and thinking of what we could do to help people on the ground,' read a post on Google's official corporate blog on Monday.

"The service, which Google said was developed with engineers from Twitter, allows people to dial a telephone number and leave a voicemail. The voicemail is automatically translated into a message that is sent on Twitter using the identifying tag #egypt, Google said.

"Google said in the blog post, titled 'Some weekend work that will (hopefully) enable more Egyptians to be heard,' that no Internet connection is required to use the service. Google listed three phone numbers for people to call to use the service...."

Good for Google, in the Lemming's opinion. Although now the Lemming thinks it's possible that the Egyptian government will shut down phone service for its subjects, too. Daft and self-destructive as such an act would be. ('And if you don't stop, I'll shoot myself in the other foot!?')

This isn't Politics: It's Common Sense

This isn't, as the Lemming has been saying fairly often of late, a political blog. Still, it seems to the Lemming that Egypt's President Mubarak might have been able to avoid the mess his country's in - if he'd bothered to listen to what his subjects had to say. It's not like he's a tyro at the job - he's been Egypt's president since 1981.

As the Lemming wrote elsewhere elsewhere, criticism hurts. (Another War-on-Terror Blog (January 30, 2011)) But, in the Lemming's opinion, it's a good idea to listen anyway. Sometimes the criticism is just someone blowing off steam. Sometimes the other guy's right.

Related posts:

Saturday, January 22, 2011

Fretting About Twitter

"Social networking under fresh attack as tide of cyber-scepticism sweeps US"
Paul Harris in New York, guardian.co.uk/The Observer (Saturday 22 January 2011)

"Twitter and Facebook don't connect people – they isolate them from reality, say a rising number of academics.

"The way in which people frantically communicate online via Twitter, Facebook and instant messaging can be seen as a form of modern madness, according to a leading American sociologist.

" 'A behaviour that has become typical may still express the problems that once caused us to see it as pathological,' MIT professor Sherry Turkle writes in her new book, Alone Together, which is leading an attack on the information age.

"The way in which people frantically communicate online via Twitter, Facebook and instant messaging can be seen as a form of modern madness, according to a leading American sociologist...."

The Lemming might take the notion that Twitter and Facebook make 'those kids' crazy a little more seriously: If the Lemming hadn't heard it before.

There was a time when television was - we were told - destroying the minds of America's youth. And serious folks were worried that the telephone was bad for the soul. The Lemming sympathizes, a little, with folks with that sort of worry. Change can hurt. But change happens: and it's best, in the Lemming's opinion, to deal with it. Not fret.

The Lemming is - in a sense - 'apathetic.' Back in the '60s and '70s, "cultural pressure to care - deeply, passionately, hysterically" about the right (or left) things didn't take. To this day, the Lemming does not think that telephones make teenagers anti-social, or that MP3 technology will bring Western civilization to its knees.

Maybe the Lemming really is 'apathetic:' or maybe new technologies aren't as dangerous as slow adapters feel they are.

There are other reasons for fearing the Internet, but the Lemming's already written about that - earlier today.

Related posts:

Saturday, January 15, 2011

Tunisia: Goodbye Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, Hello Information Age

"Tweeting Tyrants Out of Tunisia: Global Internet at Its Best"
Nate Anderson Ars Technica, Threat Level, Wired, (January 14, 2011)

"Even yesterday, it would have been too much to say that blogger, tweeters, Facebook users, Anonymous and Wikileaks had “brought down” the Tunisian government, but with today's news that the country's president Zine El Abidine Ben Ali has fled the country, it becomes a more plausible claim to make.

"Of course there was more to such demonstrations than some new technology. An individual act of desperation set off the last month of rioting, as a college-educated young man set himself on fire after police confiscated his unlicensed fruit and vegetable cart. Tunisia's high unemployment rate, rampant corruption and rising food prices added to the anger at Ben Ali's 20-plus-year rule.

"People risked their lives in the street, with some getting a bullet for their troubles, but the internet played a significant role in organizing these protests and in disseminating news and pictures of them to the world.

"After the worst unrest in his reign, Ben Ali this week promised not to run for 'election' again and to give the country a free press and the right to assemble. He fired his cabinet. It wasn't enough. Protestors sensed weakness, and today they forced Ben Ali from Tunisia. He fled ignominiously with his family for any state that would have him.

"Here's a guide to the part of this battle fought in cyberspace over the last month...."

The rest of the article gives a look at the powers that be - or, rather, were - in Tunisia, Information Age technology, and why the Lemming doesn't miss the 'Good Old Days.'

The discussion starts with Tunisia's government blocking websites.

By the way: if the Lemming doesn't seem properly enthusiastic over regulation of online content, that sort of thing is part of the reason.

As the Lemming has said before, this isn't a political blog. And the Lemming isn't political, not in the sense of always cheering one bunch and booing another. On the other hand, the Lemming likes freedom of expression, and the new media of communications you and the Lemming are using at this moment.

Posts, not entirely unrelated, not all in this blog:

Saturday, January 8, 2011

The Trusted Identities in Cyberspace National ID Card Won't be a National ID Card

"Obama to hand Commerce Dept. authority over cybersecurity ID"
Declan McCullagh, CNET (January 7, 2011)

"President Obama is planning to hand the U.S. Commerce Department authority over a forthcoming cybersecurity effort to create an Internet ID for Americans, a White House official said here today.

"It's 'the absolute perfect spot in the U.S. government' to centralize efforts toward creating an 'identity ecosystem' for the Internet, White House Cybersecurity Coordinator Howard Schmidt said...."

The CNET article points out that this federal online identity authority could have gone to the National Security Agency or the Department of Homeland Security. As the author says:

"...The move ... is likely to please privacy and civil-liberties groups that have raised concerns in the past over the dual roles of police and intelligence agencies....

The Lemming isn't often on the same page as many "privacy" and "civil liberties" advocates. This time, though, it's a (slight) relief that the DHS or NSA didn't get this particular authority.

This is not a political blog, by the way, and the Lemming will get back to that.

National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace: 'Trust Us'

"...The Obama administration is currently drafting what it's calling the National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace, which [U.S. Commerce Secretary Gary ]Locke said will be released by the president in the next few months. (An early version was publicly released last summer.)

" 'We are not talking about a national ID card,' Locke said at the Stanford event. 'We are not talking about a government-controlled system. What we are talking about is enhancing online security and privacy, and reducing and perhaps even eliminating the need to memorize a dozen passwords, through creation and use of more trusted digital identities.'

"The Commerce Department will be setting up a national program office to work on this project, Locke said.

"Details about the 'trusted identity' project are remarkably scarce. Last year's announcement referenced a possible forthcoming smart card or digital certificate that would prove that online users are who they say they are. These digital IDs would be offered to consumers by online vendors for financial transactions...."

As far as it goes, this sounds okay. A major program like this might take a few months to get planned and organized. As for this not being a "national ID card," the Lemming is fairly confident that the national ID card will not be called a national ID card.

Still: How dim do the folks inside the beltway think the rest of us are?

The Lemming said that this isn't a political blog. It's not. Not in the sense that the Lemming claims that everything done by one particular person or group is brilliant: and that everybody who disagrees is a doo-doo head. If you're curious about this blogger, check out "About the Lemming."

Back to the national ID card that won't be a national ID card.

The National ID Card That's Not a National ID Card

Some folks - not quite the same as the lot who have fits over being seen in public and other 'privacy' issues - got their skivvies in a knot a few decades back, when Americans started getting Social Security Numbers. "The mark of the Beast" was a phrase that came up fairly often. They didn't like credit cards, either, some of them: and that's another topic.

It's the Lemming's considered opinion that there isn't anything wrong, in principle, with a national online ID system. Good grief, a global system that includes anybody in Earth orbit makes sense. ("More Postcards From the Frontier" (April 7, 2010))

The Internet is big.

It's also the Lemming's considered opinion that any sort of ID system is subject to abuse. It's that "sparks fly upward" aspect of human nature. (Job 5:7)

Does that mean that the Lemming thinks the Obama administration is planning to restrict who gets to put information and opinions online, and who gets to see what? The Lemming doesn't know: but having experienced the trailing edge of McCarthyism and done time in academia when political correctness was in flower, the Lemming is - concerned.

Assuming that the feds follow through on what's been said so far, the national-ID-card-that-isn't may be well inside the Lemming's comfort zone. Back to that CNET article.

"...Schmidt stressed today that anonymity and pseudonymity will remain possible on the Internet. 'I don't have to get a credential, if I don't want to,' he said. There's no chance that 'a centralized database will emerge,' and 'we need the private sector to lead the implementation of this,' he said.

"Jim Dempsey of the Center for Democracy and Technology, who spoke later at the event, said any Internet ID must be created by the private sector--and also voluntary and competitive..."

Those words - "private sector ... voluntary and competitive" - make this system seem a whole lot more reasonable to the Lemming.

You Want Scary? Try These On For Size

"The Lemming" is a pseudonym, but the Lemming doesn't make a secret of who and what he is: a middle-aged man living in central Minnesota. A few years ago, the Lemming settled on the screen name Aluwir for new online community accounts.

Not because the Lemming wants to hide his true identity: but because "Aluwir" is a whole lot more distinctive than something like Brian8327 or "Norski." There are even a fair number of folks named "Brian Gill" online. And, for a while, one of the other Brian Gills was in a line of work similar to mine. Which is yet another topic.

The Lemming doesn't mind - at all - that folks know it's really Aluwir/Brian Gill posting on this blog, and elsewhere online. Living in a small town, where quite a large portion of the population knows my by sight may have something to do with that. Sauk Centre is a wonderful place to live: but if you prefer to be a nonentity lost in a throng of anonymous strangers, this small town isn't for you.

The Lemming is getting off-track again.

Americans have had Social Security Numbers for several generations now, and it's the Lemming's opinion that the SSN system didn't bring on global warming, food riots, or communist oppression.

Actually, the Lemming thinks that eventually there will be a sort of more-or-less-universal ID system that should give privacy advocates, civil-liberties activists and end-times preachers fits.
DNA Database
This doesn't happen very often, but sometimes babies get mixed up in the hospital. Or kidnapped. It's not a perfect world: and that's yet again another topic.

What the Lemming foresees is an extension of procedures and technologies we have right now. Footprints of infants are, as the Lemming recalls, taken in the delivery room - along with a blood sample. The first is to identify the baby, a sort of backup to the wrist tag. The second is for some now-routine medical tests.

The Lemming can't remember running into someone who thinks that the 'footprint-and-blood-test' procedure is some kind of plot. Maybe common sense is more common than it sometimes seems.

We don't, to the best of the Lemming's knowledge, have a system for analyzing a person's DNA that's fast, accurate, and inexpensive enough for this: but that blood sample could be used to get a sample of the baby's DNA.

An interstate ID system that includes a person's DNA code? The folks who object to crooks being convicted because they left evidence at the scene of their crimes wouldn't like that a bit, the Lemming suspects. The rest of us might be glad when the system made it possible to track a missing child.
Tracking Chips
Outfits like 24PetWatch have been providing pet ID microchips for years. The chips are tiny, are injected in places that don't bother the pet, and make it possible to get a positive ID on a recovered animal.

So far, the Lemming doesn't recall anyone suggesting that they be used in people.

The Lemming doesn't see anything wrong, in principle, with the idea.

Right now, the microchips can't be picked up at a distance, so it takes something like an airport screening to find out if Bowser is really pedigree Huffelton III. Given what's happened with GPS devices, the Lemming figures it's only a matter of time before something like the cell phone network could be used to find out where a kidnap victim - or the kidnapper - is in minutes.

Could a system like that be abused? Of course it could. It could also save lives. The trick will be to work out a system of social and legal controls to keep some folks from taking advantage of others.

And that's the way it's been for thousands upon thousands of years. Which is several other topics.

Somewhat-related posts:

Friday, October 8, 2010

Discovery News Feed is Moving - Has Moved

Well, the Lemming thinks this is important.
"Discovery News Has Moved"
Discovery News (October 8, 2010)

"Discovery News has moved. This feed is no longer being updated.

"Please subscribe to the latest news in Earth, Space, Tech and more here"

That's it. The whole thing. In its entirety - aside from their advertising.

The Lemming's made the needed adjustments. Awfully decent of them to let us know, what?

Thursday, September 16, 2010

Twitter Redesign: An Op-Ed, Micro-Reviewed

"Twitter's Redesign is a Giant Leap Forward"
PCWorld (September 15, 2010)

"The redesign fundamentally changes the service's interface, with a roomy, context-sensitive right panel that reminds me of Twitter for iPad.

"I can't remember many - any? - examples of a popular service or piece of software changing so much all at once as Twitter is doing with its new redesign. (If you don't have it yet, hold on: The company says it'll be a few weeks until it completely replaces Old Twitter.) It brings elements other than words onto Twitter for the first time-photos, videos, and maps. It fundamentally changes the service's interface, with a roomy, context-sensitive right panel that reminds me of Twitter for iPad. It displays threaded conversations. It includes a bunch of subtleties, like keyboard shortcuts. (TechCrunch's MG Siegler has a good roundup of some of the revamping's less obvious improvements.)

"In short, it moves in the direction that Twitter was clearly going in anyhow -- but it's one big leap rather than a series of baby steps over months or years. And it still feels like Twitter...."

Even without the first-person-singular pronoun, this PCWorld op-ed would obviously be a just that - opinion-editorial content. Which is okay.

Looks like Twitter is going to expand the width of its content - leaving less room for folks to see the wallpaper. The writer doesn't like that, and the Lemming sees the point. On the other hand, the Lemming didn't design wallpaper with vital information on it.

As it is, I can't see much of the wording on some Twitter user's accounts - my preferred screen resolution isn't at the high end of the scale. (It's 1024 x 768 pixels.)

With personal preferences for screen resolution being all over the map, I designed my Twitter wallpaper to be non-boring; representative of what I do, more or less; and relatively unimportant.

Not everybody works that way, of course.

Twitter's got a quite entertaining, artsy - and comparatively uninformative - video about it's new, cool format: "Meet the new Twitter.com." It does get around to showing some of the features, which look cool. My guess - and hope is that what they do and how they work will become apparent when Twitter launches their new-and-improved service.

Now, if they can do this and keep the 'Fail Whale' from appearing at comparatively regular intervals, the Lemming will be a happy camper.

Sort-of-related posts:

Sunday, August 29, 2010

Twitter Safety Tips: You Probably Know This Already

"10 Twitter Safety Tips To Protect Your Account & Identity"
makeuseof.com (December 16, 2009)

"While Twitter is a fun place to hang out, it has associated risks just like any other social network. As examples of the risks involved with Twitter, there are phishing scams, government security lapses, and people getting fired because of tweeting.

"Here are 10 solid Twitter safety tips you can make use of to enjoy Twitter and protect yourself.

"#1: Never Share Personal Information...."

They're talking about "email, personal or business address, telephone numbers" and pieces of information that someone could misuse.

It's all common sense, right down to the tenth item: always use a firewall and anti-virus software. The latter had better be the newer 'anti-malware' package - although they're still referred to as "anti-virus" software.

Still, like the subject of my last post, it's a fast read and good review.
A tip of the hat to TweetSmarter, on Twitter, for the heads-up on this post.

What Not to Do on Twitter

"Twitter faux pas (10 Twitter no-no's)"
Info Carnivore (July 4, 2010)

"I've now published two articles on twitter etiquette (twitterquette) and they've been well received. What about twitter no-no's. What NOT to do or tweet on twitter? Here are ten that I've come up with. What are your suggested twitter no-no's?

"1. One word tweets. At least put a few words together and have something make sense. Single word tweets mean nothing to pretty much everyone. This includes mentions that are nothing but a user name.

"2. Old, old, news. Re-tweeting your discovery of a video that went viral four years ago is top notch lame! Everyone else on the internet has already seen it. Be happy you finally did and move on, no need to remind everyone...."

And so it goes: it's a fast read, all the way to:

"...10. Personal tweets. That's what facebooks for, don't you think?"

Some of the points are simple common sense: Don't tell everybody on Twitter that you're going to be gone for a week. You may as well add that you left the key under the doormat and hang out a sign reading 'please rob me' while you're at it.

Others - particularly, in my opinion, #10 - are a bit more subjective. I'd have to know what the author means by "personal tweets." If it's the sort of 'I'm flossing my teeth now' thing: yes, that's too much information that online friends and acquaintances can probably live without.

In my case, though, I'm on Twitter to meet and communicate with people, not just plug my [Excellent! Stupendous! Brilliant!] blog posts. If I don't share personal information now and then, I'll come across like one of those spambots.

Bottom line, though: this is a short read. And a good review, even if you figure you already know about how not to lose friends and alienate people online.
A tip of the hat to danielsnyder1, on Twitter, for the heads-up on his post.

Monday, August 16, 2010

Why Online Profiles Matter

"Why you must keep track of your online profile"
Dan Griliopoulos, Internet News, techradar.com (August 14, 2010, probably. Some Saturday, at any rate)

"You might not realise it yet, but you're a brand. All this time you've been walking and talking and posting on the internet, thinking you were a person, when you've been a brand all along. Who'd have thought it?

All of your activities have been contributing to the brand, building a profile for it and even advertising it.

Why is it important to think of yourself as a brand? Because as information about individuals becomes increasingly available online, you want to make sure that information is not only accurate but also positive and succinct....
"

The last part of the article is a review of several services someone could use to track their online presence. I'm not likely to use them: my budget is 'way too tight for anything along those lines that's not free.

Besides, My name, Brian Gill, isn't all that uncommon. I don't see a point in being the very first "Brian Gill" you find in a Google search. Particularly since the odds are that whoever's doing the search is looking for Brian Gill the tenor at New York University, or Brian Gill the acoustic singer-songwriter, or Brian Gill the surgeon.

I'm the only Brian Gill who lives in a small town in Central Minnesota - and the odds are pretty good that you'll find me if you use my name and the name of one of my blogs. Or put "Minnesota" in the search.

Just the same, I updated my Google profile (Brian Gill), and added a link to it in the sidebars of my blogs.


A tip of the hat to , on Twitter, for the heads-up on this article.

Friday, August 13, 2010

Growing Your Online Presence and Balancing Your Life

"12 Healthy Habits to Grow Your Online Presence and Keep Balance in Your Life"
Cool Cat Teacher Blog (July 24, 2010)

"A Little Reflection before Getting Down to Business

"This just came on my Pandora radio station as I'm doing my monthly 'file maintenance' and moving pages around. (See my Facebook posts on technology productivity for more on this.) When I came to my presentations folder, I saw a journey. A journey of people and faces and places. Those who gave me chances early on and things applied for - not knowing any better, I guess...."

Don't give up on the post just yet. Many paragraphs later, there's this:

"...I sincerely hope that I've helped as many as have helped me. There are too many to name. For really, the story of so many teachers is like mine -- we joined in and began sharing and those who shared back far exceeded what we gave. So, I thought I would codify some of the lessons I've learned."

"Healthy Habits to Grow Your Online Presence and Keep Balance Your Life

"What we measured out has been measured back to us ten fold. So, this is the message you to, the teacher from this mini trip down memory lane:..."

After that there's a 12-point list of pretty good ideas, each with between one and four paragraphs of discussion. Most of it boils down to "play nice," but I think it's worth your time to read through the list:
  1. Share.
  2. Respond.
  3. Comment
  4. Link Generously
  5. Read (or Listen) Prolifically
  6. Distribute yourself
  7. Beware of Flattery
  8. Life Life Online AND Off-line
  9. Latch Key Your Legacy
  10. Laugh (a lot)
  11. Take Every Presentation Seriously
  12. Expect Criticism

Dealing With People in the Real World

Let's remember that online communities are as 'real' as a coffee shop. We can't spill cappuccino on someone online, but we're still dealing with people.

Flattery Feels Good, But - - -

The seventh point, "beware of flattery," is about 'incoming' flattery. This post is aimed at bloggers who are career educators, but I think this advice applies to everyone: "When you believe your own press you can become arrogant and there is a lot of flattery that runs around."

I think the reverse is true, too: Empty praise of someone else probably won't do them much good in the long run; and can harm your own credibility.
Intelligent People and the Stupid Slobs Who Don't Agree With You
While I'm on the subject, disparaging remarks about 'those stupid, ignorant slobs who don't agree with you' probably isn't a good idea, either.

One of the online communities I'm in has quite a few folks who pride themselves on being very broad-minded and tolerant of other people's ideas: provided that the other person agrees with them on all essentials. In some ways, it reminds me of doing time in American academia. (Isn't the Lemming "apathetic?" I've discussed this before.)

Here's a fairly typical exchange of ideas:
  • "So I have a lot to say. I think I am reasonable and intelligent. My blog is about finding reason in politics...."
    • "Finding reason in politics? That could be harder than finding a coherent thought in Sarah Palin's head! Good luck."
Before anyone has a stroke, I'll acknowledge that there are chauvinistic conservatives, too. Me? I'm Catholic - which is yet another topic. ("Conservative? Liberal? Democrat? Republican? No, I'm Catholic," A Catholic Citizen in America (November 3, 2008))

Bottom line? If your goal is to be considered "intelligent" by a tight little group of like-minded people, go ahead: heap scorn on the doo-doo heads who don't entirely agree with you and your pals.

The rest of us, I think, are well-advised to assume that not all of Earth's 6,000,000,000-plus people are divided into the smart ones who agree with us and the stupid ones who don't.

The Cool Cat Teacher blogger comes at this idea from another direction in the 12th point.

Is There Life Off-Line?

The next point, "Life Life Online AND Off-line," is important. And doesn't just apply to that nerd with the pocket protector over there, or the game-addicted teen.

Moving along.

Not All Laughs are Created Equal

The tenth point,
"Laugh (a lot)," is good advice. Being the sort of person I am, the laugh my memory called up was the shrieking cackle of a B-movie mad scientist.

Criticism

The 12th point, "expect criticism," is more common-sense observations and advice. Including this bit of insight:

"...You set the tone for your blog. If you flame and post when you're angry you will use poor word choice. If you attack personally, you will have that reflected back at you...."

Of course, if the only people you care about are those who are just like you: well, flame on. I don't think that's a prudent approach: but that's my values at work.

Pretty Good Advice, Actually

Bottom line? I think this is a pretty good set of advice for folks whose ambitions include communicating with others. Definitely not a waste of time.

Related posts:
A tip of the hat to Parentella, on Twitter, for the heads-up on a post that linked to the post I micro-reviewed.

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Cartoon Avatars: They're Now, They're Wow!

"Cartoon avatars are back in vogue"
CNN (August 9, 2010)

"Editor's note: Damon Brown is a Northern California-based freelance writer and author of books, including 'Damon Brown's Simple Guide to the iPad' and 'Porn & Pong: How "Grand Theft Auto," "Tomb Raider" and Other Sexy Games Changed Our Culture.'

"If recent trends are any indication, cartoon self-caricatures are becoming more popular than the clichéd photo in the mirror headshot. Cartoon avatars, both classic and new, are hot right now.

"The cartoon-spawning series 'Mad Men' is back. The critically and commercially successful AMC show about 1960s ad execs has revived its popular 'Mad Men Yourself' campaign, which lets you create an animated doppelganger that smokes like a train and wouldn't be out of place in a film noir.

"Since 'Mad Men Yourself' launched a year ago, thousands of people adorned their Facebook profiles with the retro caricatures. The trend was not unlike the personalized knockoffs of Shepard Fairley's striking Obama Hope design during the 2008 presidential election...."

I'm inclined to agree with the writer, that this is a fad that will end as soon as folks get tired of seeing their 'unique' avatar repeated with minor variations on social networks.

Clichéd or not, I think that a clear photo of a person's face is generally the best avatar. Or, in my case, part of the face: That big eye is mine. Most folks are able to distinguish faces, almost without effort. The trick is to pick a relatively high-contrast, sharp-focus photo with a neutral background.

The biggest drawback, as I see it, to using something that's popular as an avatar is that - it's popular. Standing out from the crowd takes work online, and blending in with everybody else who's following a current trend doesn't help.

Friday, August 6, 2010

Think, Then Tweet: Pretty Good Advice

"Tweet Wisely or Forever Hold Your Peace"
The Blog of Frances Cole Jones (August 4, 2010)

"One measure of the popularity of Twitter is the proliferation of Twitter debacles due to inappropriate tweets—with one Scottish politician committing political death when he referred to his elderly constituents as 'coffin dodgers.'

"And politicians aren't the only offenders: while many people have a morbid fascination with celebrities, is there anyone who doesn't have Lindsay-Lohan-tweet-fatigue? I'm about to buy that family a washer/dryer so they can stop airing their dirty laundry in public...."

It's a four-point list of common-sense advice. Starting with "Tweets are forever: Don't tweet anything you wouldn't want to see on the front page of the New York Times."

Another, related, post:

"5 Myths Believed by Those on the Social Media Sidelines"
Paul Steinbrueck, Online Mission (August 4, 2010)

"A few weeks ago I was having a conversation with some people about a matter. Some of the people were already aware of the situation because I had posted about it on Facebook. Others, who were out of the loop, proceeded to mock Facebook rather than recognize it was Facebook that enabled some of us to be better informed and better connected than they were.

"Social media is having a huge impact on the way people and organizations communicate and relate to each other. Facebook now has more than 500 million users and has surpassed Google as the most popular site in the world.

"Yet some organizations remain on the social media sidelines. I believe it’s because they’ve bought into some myths about social media, myths I’d like to put an end to right now...."

The points, each one discussed in the article, are:
  1. Social media is a fad.
  2. Social media is only for young people.
  3. Social media is narcissistic.
  4. Social media is a waste of time.
  5. Social media is irrelevant to organizations like mine.
Related posts:
A tip of the hat to TweetSmarter and Steveology, on Twitter, for the heads-up on this post, and the article.

Tuesday, August 3, 2010

'The Report of My Death' - Bill Cosby, This Time

"Bill Cosby: I'm alive. Now, please cut it out"
This Just In, CNN blog (August 2, 2010)

"Bill Cosby is used to winking at internet rumors of his death. But after another one spread Monday, he said he hopes people will give the hoaxes a rest.

"After false news of Cosby’s death spread by Twitter on Monday - 'Bill Cosby died' was a trending topic on the microblogging service - the 73-year-old comedian called CNN's 'Larry King Live' to prove he still is around...."

Bogus reports of celebrity deaths are nothing new. Mark Twain wrote: "The report of my death was an exaggeration." There's a copy of his 1897 note at www.twainquotes.com.

I was on Twitter yesterday, and didn't see anything about Cosby's death. Maybe I don't follow the 'right' people. I'll grant that information technology makes it easier for silly ideas to spread quickly - but I don't think that social networks have anything near a monopoly on getting stories wrong.

Related posts:

Monday, August 2, 2010

Social Media and - Old Web Habits?!

"Social Media Changes Old Web Habits"
PCWorld (August 2, 2010)

"Social media now consume 23 percent of our time online, stealing time away from e-mail, reading news, and spending time at portals such as Yahoo.com, according a recent Nielsen study.

"Social Media Changes Old Web HabitsThe study tracked the online activity of 200,000 American users from June 2009 to June 2010. Time invested on social networking sites grew nearly 50 percent -- from 16 percent to 23 percent -- and that social gaming surpassed e-mail to take the number two position. Americans now log an average of six hours per month twiddling thumbs on social networks.

"Though e-mail usage dropped on desktops -- declining to 8.3 percent from 12 percent -- it remains dominant on mobile devices, occupying 42 percent of our smartphone time in comparison to 37 percent last year...."

Once again, research demonstrates that change happens. Which keeps things interesting.

And here's something about my demographic, "Americans over 50:"

"...Social networkers aren't just teenyboppers anymore, either. Nielsen discovered that twice as many Americans over 50 visited social networks than kids under 18. That means your mom and dad aren't the only 'hip' parents out there with Facebook pages...."

I suppose I could contribute some of the conventional hand-wringing about 'really' communicating and how thing just aren't the way they used to be: but others are doing a fine job with that sort of thing. Besides, I like Information Age technology.

(On Twitter, I'm Aluwir.)

Related post:

Thursday, July 29, 2010

Lemming Tracks: Erin Andrews, Policing the Internet, and Power to the People

"ESPN's Erin Andrews: 'No One Is Policing' Internet, Which 'Needs to be Regulated' "
CNS News (July 29, 2010)

"ESPN reporter Erin Andrews, a victim of stalking, appeared with members of Congress on Tuesday to announce the proposed 'STALKERS Act.' Andrews -- whose stalker posted a video online that he had secretly recorded of her nude in a hotel room – told CNSNews.com that 'no one is policing' the Internet and it 'needs to be regulated.'

" 'It needs to be regulated. It's not. I mean, that's the bottom line. It needs to be regulated. There's no policing of it,” Andrews told CNSNews.com after the press conference on Capitol Hill.

"CNSNews.com also asked Andrews if the government should monitor content on certain Web sites.

"She said, 'If somebody could think of something, I mean, they'd be a hero because, you know, there's just a lot of stuff that needs to be policed; that needs to be looked at. No one's held accountable for what they put on the Internet.'..."

First of all, I think that what was done to Erin Andrews was wrong. It wasn't right. The fellow shouldn't have done what he did.

Stalking isn't nice. People shouldn't do it.

Erin Andrews is quite understandably upset.

Rescuing a Spunky Girl Reporter, Controlling What We Say Online

There's a distinction between stalking, what was done to Erin Andrews: and posting something on your blog that the establishment doesn't like.
The Sixties, the Establishment, and - Finally - Power to the People
If "the establishment" sounds terribly sixties, I'm not surprised. It's closely associated with peace protests, flower power, and kids who didn't like gray flannel suits.

I was there, and there was a - shall we say certain coolness? - between the folks who were perfectly content with being in charge and having things pretty much their way, and the rest of us.

After a half-century, a fair number of the screaming kids now wear three-piece suits and are solidly "establishment" themselves. And that's almost another topic.

Not quite, though, because the folks in charge today still get annoyed when everybody doesn't agree with them. They're particularly ticked off when somebody has the effrontery (from their point of view) to criticize their policies in public.

It's easy to see disagreement as a threat. I remember the trailing edge of America's McCarthyism, I endured the years when political correctness was in bloom - and I'm very concerned about efforts to "protect" people from those bad guys on the Internet.

You know, the ones who don't agree with the establishment.

I've discussed this in other blogs:Bottom line?

I think freedom of expression is important.

I also think freedom of expression is important for people who don't fully support the views of whoever is in charge at the moment.

Ready access to the Internet has given people who aren't part of the established order the power to speak their minds, be heard - and maybe make a difference.

That, finally, is real "power to the people."

'Something's Gotta Be Done' - But 'Be Careful What You Wish For'

I agree that enforcement of 'stalking laws' and the emerging sanctions against producers of malware is somewhere between inadequate - and a sick joke.

But I am very concerned about emotional pleas to regulate what people do online.

Remember, I think that stalking isn't nice and that people shouldn't do it.

This isn't about stalking.

I think that "freedom of expression" is useless, if the only people you're allowed to communicate with are the ones within a few yards of you.

Today, you can get your message published, even if you're not a member of Congress. You don't need to have a personal relationship with the editor of a major metropolitan newspaper, or be best-buds with a network executive.

You don't even need to have the wealth it takes to buy advertising space on a national network, or buy a publishing house.

Most importantly, you can get your message out: even if you don't support today's establishment, and their policies.

All it takes is time at a keyboard, and access to the Internet.

Today.

I agree that attractive young women in high-profile careers should be allowed to express their opinions.

I also think that the rest of us should be allowed to express our opinions.

'First They Came for the Jews/Socialists/Communists...'

Martin Niemöller's poem has been re-written enough times. You've probably heard or read at least one version of it. (December 11, 2009))

Yes, online behavior "needs to be regulated." To the extent that we need to have sanctions against people who take inappropriate pictures of Erin Andrews and others in her position.

I hope, sincerely, that Erin's emotional plea doesn't lead to the rest of us losing our freedom to say things that the powers-that-be don't like.
Unique, innovative candles

Visit us online:
Spiral Light Candle  • Find a Retailer
• Spiral Light Candle online store

Pinterest: From the Man Behind the Lemming

Top 10 Most-Viewed Posts

Today's News! Some of it, anyway

Actually, some of yesterday's news may be here. Or maybe last week's.
The software and science stuff might still be interesting, though. Or not.
The Lemming thinks it's interesting: Your experience may vary.
("Following" list moved here, after Blogger changed formats)

Who Follows the Lemming?

WebSTAT

Family Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory