Showing posts with label England. Show all posts
Showing posts with label England. Show all posts

Friday, May 18, 2012

Amazing, A-Maze-ing, A-Maize-ing, and a Giddy Lemming

"World's Largest Maze"
Dole Plantation, , Hawaii

"...In 2008, Dole Plantation's giant Pineapple Garden Maze was declared the world's largest maze. The maze stretches over three acres and includes nearly two and one-half miles of paths crafted from 14,000 colorful Hawaiian plants. ... one of only a handful of permanent botanical mazes in America. The fastest finishers win a prize and enter into the history of Dole Plantation, with their names recorded on a sign at the maze's entrance...."

The folks running Dole's Pineapple Garden Maze set eight stations inside, which the Lemming gathers must be found and marked before emerging from the maze. That's a pretty good idea: otherwise, someone might get a bearing on the direction of the exit, and barrel straight toward it, right through the hedges. Of course, some of those "colorful Hawaiian plants" probably have thorns, so maybe that wouldn't be such a good idea.


(Dole pineapple maze on Oahu (February 12, 2008) ErgoSum88, via Wikipedia, used w/o permission)

Eight-Acre Corn Maze

"Corn Maze"
Denver Botanic Gardens

"We invite you to get lost at this year’s Denver Botanic Gardens at Chatfield's 8-acre Corn Maze.

"Navigate the twists and turns of the newly designed cornfield this fall at Denver Botanic Gardens at Chatfield's Corn Maze.

"Wind your way through acres of corn, view the design from two 15-foot tall illuminated bridges that overlook...."

Since "corn" is what folks in this part of the world call "maize," the Lemming thinks that names line "Corn Maze" are hilarious. Your experience may vary.

Hedge Mazes Predate Harry Potter

"Hampton Court Maze"

"...'It is the most famous Maze in the history of the world, and immeasurably the one most visited.'
(Ernest Law, 1926)


"The maze at Hampton Court was designed by George London and Henry Wise and commissioned around 1700 by William III. Originally planted using hornbeam and later replanted using yew, the Hampton Court maze covers a third of an acre, is trapezoid in shape and is the UK's oldest surviving hedge maze.

"The maze itself is referred to as a multicursal or puzzle maze and is known for confusing and intriguing visitors with its many twists, turns and dead ends. Before the creation of the Hampton Court maze, unicursal or single path mazes were the most popular form of maze in the UK. Unlike the puzzle maze, the single path maze has one path, usually in a spiral shape, winding to a centre point...."

Outdoor mazes were around for about three centuries before "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire" hit the shelves: but it's still a rousing story. And another topic.

Ashcombe Maze

"Hedge Maze"
Ashcombe Maze and Lavender Gardens

"Australia's oldest and most famous traditional Hedge Maze now standing over 3 metres high & 2 metres thick. With four mosaic flags to find in each half of the hedge maze, the hundreds of metres of winding paths take you through the South Maze into the Centre Garden before you tackle the North Maze. While not overly complicated it does take a little while to make your way through (some people take longer than others!) The North Maze is a totally different layout to the South Maze, so any tricks you worked out while making your way through the first part, mean absolutely nothing in the other!

"The Ashcombe Hedge Maze was planted in the 1970’s with more than 1000 Cypress (Cupressus macrocarpa) plants. They are planted at around 1 metre intervals, and each year the hedge gets a bit bigger (and the paths get a bit narrower!) Being a drought tolerant plant the hedge only needs irrigation in extreme heat waves. It now stands more than 3m high and 2m thick.

"We do not use string lines or straight edges to trim our hedge and the overall effect is very organic...."

That first photo gives a pretty good idea of how complicated and organic-looking the Ashcombe Maze is: but it's hard to tell just how big the thing is. Judging by this one, nobody's going to be looking over the tops of this maze. Not without a periscope. Assuming that's a normal-size human being. Come to think of it, we can't see the creature's face.

Which brings up an interesting point. Do the folks running these mazes keep track of how many people go in - and come out? And what do they do if the "in" and "out" count doesn't match?

What if more people came out of the maze, than went in?

Then there's this story about an absent-minded dude named Theseus.

Vaguely-related posts:

Monday, April 30, 2012

Skylon Spaceplane's New Engine Test; Old Video; Passenger Module

"Key tests for Skylon spaceplane project"
BBC News (April 27, 2012)

"UK engineers have begun critical tests on a new engine technology designed to lift a spaceplane into orbit.


(Reaction Engines, via BBC, used w/o permission)
"The pre-cooler demonstration is a major step in proving the Skylon concept"

"The proposed Skylon vehicle would operate like an airliner, taking off and landing at a conventional runway.

"Its major innovation is the Sabre engine, which can breathe air like a jet at lower speeds but switch to a rocket mode in the high atmosphere.

"Reaction Engines Limited (REL) believes the test campaign will prove the readiness of Sabre's key elements.

"This being so, the firm would then approach investors to raise the £250m needed to take the project into the final design phase.

" 'We intend to go to the Farnborough International Air Show in July with a clear message,' explained REL managing director Alan Bond.

" 'The message is that Britain has the next step beyond the jet engine; that we can reduce the world to four hours - the maximum time it would take to go anywhere. And that it also gives us aircraft that can go into space, replacing all the expendable rockets we use today.'..."

The Lemming's been following Skylon for a few years now. It's good to see another milestone approaching for the robot spaceplane.

Giving Skylon artificial intelligence should save a lot of weight, since autopilots don't need the sort of bulky environment systems that humans require. It's smart design, in the Lemming's opinion, since Skylon is designed for routine cargo runs.

On the other hand, Skylon's operators may run into legal complications. The Lemming hasn't researched this, but it seems likely that someone's going to make a fuss about a 269-foot-long robot sharing airspace and taxiways with other aircraft. There may even be laws that say an airplane has to have a human pilot.

Human Pilots: Good News, Bad News

In the Lemming's opinion, humans are pretty good at dealing with unexpected situations. Particularly if there isn't a whole lot of data available for a thorough analysis. As someone said:
  • Computers are designed to arrive at correct solutions
    • Given enormous amounts of data
      • All of which is completely accurate
  • Human brains are designed to arrive at correct solutions
    • Given very little data
      • Most of which is wrong
A wide-awake, undistracted, human pilot is nice to have around when you're 1,500 feet over a major city and the engines quit. But now and then someone falls asleep, or misses the airport: which tends to diminish the impression that a human's place is at the controls. The Lemming has posted about the ups and downs of having humans in the loop before:

Skylon: the Video

"SKYLON Spaceplane: Mission Animation"

SpaceRenaissance, YouTube (August 10, 2010)
video, 6:45
"SKYLON is the successor to Britain's HOTOL spaceplane concept, being developed by Reaction Engines Ltd (REL). It is an unpiloted fully reusable aircraft-like vehicle capable of transporting 12 tonnes of cargo into space and is intended as a replacement for expensive expendable launchers in the commerical {!] market. (Source: www.spacefuture.com)..."

"Blue Danube," starting about 3:18 into the video, is a nod to Stanley Kubrick's "2001: A Space Odyssey" (1968). That, or a whacking great coincidence. Either way, it's a pretty good 'this is how it works' video. Or, more accurately, how Skylon will work. Provided that technical issues are manageable, and investors keep funding it.

Of course, it's possible that Reaction Engines' investors will decide that they'd rather not be part of 21st century transportation. That would change details aerospace transport, but not the 'big picture.' In the Lemming's opnion. There are other outfits with systems to service low Earth orbit installations in the works, like:There are more: and McDonnell Douglas Aerospace/Boeing may dust off its Delta Clipper/DC X.

Skylon: Optional Passenger Module


(Reaction Engines Ltd., used w/o permission)

That passenger module could easily go through a few more design changes before Skylon actually flies. From the looks of what Reaction Engines Ltd. has now, Skylon flights could serve as a sort of commuter service to whatever replaces the ISS. Or maybe drop the module off in orbit as a sort of mini-station.

More about Skylon:
  • "SKYLON"
    Reaction Engines Ltd.
Related posts:
Still more, about:

Friday, March 9, 2012

Hackers Hooked: Some of Them, Anyway

" 'Lulzsec hackers' arrested in international swoop"
Technology, BBC News (March 6, 2012)

"Seven alleged hackers based in the US, UK and Republic of Ireland have been charged with crimes related to computer attacks said to have affected 'over one million victims'.

"The FBI said that five of the men were involved in the group Lulzsec, while a sixth was a 'member' of Antisec.

"It said that Lulzsec's 'leader' Hector Xavier Monsegur had pleaded guilty in August to 12 criminal charges....

"...The bureau said that Mr Monsegur - also known as Sabu - had admitted involvement in cyber attacks against the media groups Sony Pictures Entertainment, Fox Broadcasting Company and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) among others...."

How bad could this be - really? After all, it looks like the victims are Big Businesses. The Lemming will skip the usual stuff about corporate greed, oppressed classes, and the rest. You've heard it all before, anyway.

Good Morning, Information Age

A hundred years ago, hacking into networks run by large companies wouldn't have made a bit of difference in the lives of ordinary folks. Mainly because there weren't any computer networks to be hacked into.

That was then, this is now.

Large corporations use contemporary information technology to store data about folks who do business with them - which includes a whole lot of folks all across the economic spectrum. Some of the data may not be as important as, say, access codes to bank accounts. It's a little hard to imagine how lives would be disrupted as a result of X Factor contestant data getting stolen.

On the other hand, little things can add up. Particularly in a world that's increasingly interconnected. And where an increasing share of the 7,000,000,000 or so folks have Internet access - or know someone who does.

Contestant Data, a Porn Site, America's Congress, and All That

"Hackers claiming to be part of Lulzsec said they had carried out or have been linked to the following attacks:"
  • May 7: US X Factor contestant database
  • May 10: Fox.com user passwords
  • May 15: Database listing locations of UK cash machines
  • May 23: Sonymusic Japan website
  • May 30: US broadcaster PBS. Staff logon information
  • June 2: Sonypictures.com user information
  • June 3: Infragard website (FBI affiliated organisation)
  • June 3: Nintendo.com
  • June 10: Pron.com pornographic website
  • June 13: Senate.gov - website of US Senate
  • June 13: Bethesda software website. User information
  • June 14: EVE Online, League of Legends, The Escapist and others
  • June 16:'Technical disruption' to the website of the CIA
  • June 20: The website of the UK's Serious Organised Crime Agency (Soca) taken offline by denial of service attack
    (Source: BBC News)
The BBC article doesn't say, but presumably these dates are all in 2011.

Customers with data on Nintendo.com probably didn't appreciate having their data fiddled with: but life would probably still go on, even if every customer of a giant like Nintendo lost data they'd entrusted to the entertainment company.

The American Congress, now: that lot is supposed to be running this country, so there might have been serious consequences.

The same goes for networks used by the FBI, CIA, and Soca. Not that they're running any countries - conspiracy buffs notwithstanding - but the Lemming thinks that data used by national law enforcement might be more important than access codes for online games. But that's just the Lemming's opinion.

But - remember that we're living in a very interconnected world, and a big one. Get enough folks spending time unscrambling entertainment accounts, instead of going about their normal routines: and you've got the potential for some fairly large-scale consequences.

Visa, Mastercard, Paypal, and a 124-Year Sentence

"...According to the court papers Mr Monsegur formed Lulzsec last May. It said he acted as a 'rooter', identifying vulnerabilities in victim's computer systems.

"Alongside other recruited hackers he is also alleged to have attacked the US Senate, the cyber security firm Unveillance, Visa, Mastercard and Paypal.

"The FBI said he faced a maximum sentence of more than 124 years in prison if found guilty of all counts...."

That's 124 years, maximum, if found guilty: Mr. Monsegur will probably serve substantially less time. From his point of view, that's a sort of 'worst-case scenario.'

Is doing time for a dozen decades overkill for this sort of offense? That's a good question. It looks like Mr. Monsegur did an awful lot of damage - spread out over a whole lot of people, but still an awful lot of damage.

Whether or not the sentence is 'fair' or not: the Lemming hopes someone has the sense to make sure that Mr. Monsegur doesn't have Internet access while he's a guest of the legal system.

No Sudden Shortage of Hackers

"...Trend Micro's director of security research, Rik Ferguson, added that while this might mark the end of Lulzsec, it would be premature to say the same about Anonymous.

" 'Anonymous is a very different organisation to Lulzsec and other more closely linked groups - anyone can and does act in the name of Anonymous and their activities do not require individual hacker publicity or disclosure of personally identifiable details,' he said.

" 'The very fact that Sabu became the "celebrity" he was, illustrates the real difference between Lulzsec and Anonymous.

" 'I think the hackers we really need to worry about are those that trusted no-one and sought no glory in the first place.'..."

It would be nice if someone could wave a magic wand, and make everybody want to be nice to everybody else. Or, not.

Actually, the Lemming would be very, very, concerned if someone could do that. The situation could make Orwell's "Nineteen Eighty-Four" look like a Sunday school picnic, in comparison. And that's another topic.

It's somewhat reassuring to see another set of arrests. The Lemming's not being vindictive: it's a relief to see that law enforcement is taking 'cybercrime' seriously. It's also, in the Lemming's opinion, good that the legal codes in America and the United Kingdom now take late-20th-century information technology into account.

Will there be other hack attacks? Almost certainly. But it looks like folks are starting to take the issue seriously - and that's a good thing.

Related posts:

Saturday, April 30, 2011

Lemming Tracks: Report from the Department of Silly Hats

"Princess Beatrice and the hat that launched a Facebook page [Poll] [Updated to include, um, commentary]"
Ministry of Gossip, Los Angeles Times (April 29, 2011)

"Oh, Princess Beatrice -- the hat she presumably thought was a lovely choice for Prince William and Kate Middleton's royal wedding turned out to be a royal disaster, prompting the scorn of thousands of Facebook users. Their hate wasn't necessarily for all hats, but rather specifically for the one perched Friday on Beatrice's high-profile head.

"The 22-year-old took a risk donning headgear that many thought would be more appropriate for Lady Gaga, and the risky hat choice quickly backfired for her on Facebook. Witness the emergence of "Princess Beatrice's ridiculous Royal Wedding hat," a group dedicated to her headgear that had received more than 18,000 "likes" just hours after the ceremony at Westminster Abbey. Has any topper since Aretha Franklin's unforgettable inauguration hat seen such biting abuse?..."

Princess Beatrice is the lady in beige, with the oval-and-ribbon sculpture stuck to her forehead.


(from Ministry of Gossip, Los Angeles Times, used w/o permission)

Back to the L. A. Times op-ed:

"...Beatrice, the daughter of Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson, stepped out at the fairy tale wedding in a sculptured ribbon topper made by London milliner Philip Treacy, a native of Ireland who trimmed the tops of dozens of guests at the wedding including Victoria Beckham, Zara Phillips and Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall.

"But when the hat-crowned Beatrice and her sister Princess Eugenie, 21, emerged from their ride, one comparison rang clear: The evil 'Cinderella' stepsisters Anastasia and Drizella had arrived...."

Discussion of Princess Beatrice's headgear goes somewhat downhill from there.

Although the Lemming acknowledges that the hoop-and-ribbon arrangement might seem somewhat out of place here in Sauk Centre, Minnesota: from what has been aired and published about couture, haute and otherwise, at and around the royal wedding, Princess Beatrice's hat might be considered a tad understated, if anything.

Consider: it's beige. Symmetrical. And not even shiny.

The Lemming was impressed by the imaginative range of headgear exhibited yesterday. Many of wearable sculptures occupied significantly more volume than that beige hat. One reminded the Lemming, slightly, of the flying fried eggs in a first-season Star Trek episode. Another, of a wireless headset caught moments after catastrophic flashover. The Lemming was unable to find an online pictorial record of the latter, alas!

The Lemming is, therefore, somewhat at a loss when it comes to understanding the reaction to Princess Beatrice's hat. Particularly considering options available to someone in her position. Think of the possibilities - - -

Unique 2010 Autumn/Winter collection during London Fashion Week, February 20, 2010. REUTERS/Suzanne Plunkett
(from Oddly Enough, Reuters, used w/o permission)

Yes: it could have been worse.

In fact, compared to her 2008 butterfly number, Princess Beatrice's hat was, in the Lemming's opinion, a study in understated elegance. Not the sort of thing one generally sees here in central Minnesota: but cultural standards seem to be different in the United Kingdom.

Clockwise from upper left: 'Fluttering in: Princess Beatrice in a spectacular hat' (MailOnline); 'Princess Beatrice and her hat for the royal wedding' (Ministry of Gossip/L. A. Times); 'April 29: Christine Peckham from London wears a fancy hat along the Royal Wedding route in London on Friday. (AP)'; 'Ministerial misstep: The wife of Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg
may have gone a bit too theatrical with her attire at the royal wedding.' (SFUNZIPPED, SFGate, San Francisco Chronicle)
(Clockwise from upper left: MailOnline; Ministry of Gossip/L. A. Times; AP, via FoxNews.com; SFUNZIPPED, SFGate, San Francisco Chronicle; used w/o permission)

For those keeping score, clockwise from upper left: Princess Beatrice, 2008; Princess Beatrice, at the 2011 royal wedding; Christine Peckham from London, along the royal wedding route in London; the wife of Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, at the 2011 royal wedding.

Not-entirely-unrelated posts:
News and views:

Friday, October 29, 2010

What Happened to Argleton?!

"Welcome to Argleton, the town that doesn't exist"
guardian.co.uk (November 3, 2009)

"The world's eyes are focused on a small village called Argleton just off the A59 near Ormskirk, Lancashire. Camera crews have been dispatched. "Argleton" is fast becoming a popular hashtag on Twitter. There is even talk of merchandising opportunities.

"The reason for all the interest is simple: Argleton doesn't actually exist. It is a phantom village that appears on Google Maps. You can search online for Argleton's local weather forecast (10C yesterday), property prices (not much for sale at the moment) or for the number of a local plumber, but in reality the village's coordinates point to little more than a muddy field. However, just a few hundred metres away stands the very real village of Aughton. So, is this a case of a simple spelling mistake by a cartographer? Or is Argleton evidence of something more conspiratorial afoot in the county? After all, the Ormskirk and Skelmersdale Advertiser has already posed the question of whether the Argleton mystery might indicate the presence of a 'Bermuda triangle of West Lancashire'...."

The Lemming rather likes the idea that a vast conspiracy of space aliens, Elvis and the Knights Templar is involved - and that Argleton really does exist - cleverly hidden by holographic projectors and mind-control rays from the invisible mothership.

None of which are mentioned in the article.

See? That proves there's a conspiracy!

Let's see: Edge Hill University in Ormskirk's head of web services, Mike Nolan, says it's most likely that somebody's fingers skidded when they keyed in "Aughton" - and it came out "Argleton."

Not as cool as the space-alien explanation - but a great deal more plausible.

Or is that what they want us to thing?!

The Lemming has got to get some rest.

Thursday, October 14, 2010

British Queen Cancells Christmas (Party)

"Oh Glum All Ye Faithful"
The Sun (U.K.) (October 14, 2010)

"Faithful royal staff were devastated last night after the Queen axed the Buckingham Palace Christmas party in a cost-cutting drive.

"Hundreds were looking forward to the lavish bash as it is the one time they can mingle with senior Royals.

"But Her Majesty was determined to show solidarity with a nation struggling with hardship and called it off after consulting senior courtiers. One worker said: "It's the first time in memory the party's been cancelled. We're all devastated as it's a great night when everyone lets their hair down...."

From The Sun's description, the annual Buckingham Palace Christmas party sounds like the equivalent of a company's Christmas office party - at one of those companies where the boss has the good sense to let employees act like people.

The Lemming lives across the ocean, near the center of the North American continent, so this really isn't my business. Since blogging is about opinions, and I've never been particularly lacking in that commodity, here goes.

In the Lemming's opinion:
  • Not throwing that Christmas party this year
    • Won't make much practical difference in the United Kingdom's economic situation
    • Does make sense, as a symbolic gesture
  • Various folks will complain
    • Because the party's not going on this year
    • Because the party was thrown previous years
    • For no discernible reason
A few decades back, the White House here in America didn't turn on the lights on a Christmas tree. The country was going through a sort of energy crunch at the time. That tree was a big one - but at the time I thought it was silly to 'save energy' by not using some infinitesimal fraction of the country's electrical power.

On the other hand, silly gestures like that do make a difference. Sometimes. Maybe. At a minimum, they send the message: "Yes, I know what's going on."

The Lemming doesn't know about U.K. politics, but here in America it is a little reassuring when someone inside the beltway shows some awareness of what goes on in the rest of the country.

And that's another topic. For another blog.

Meanwhile, a little early, 'Merry Christmas.'

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

"Jerusalem," "Land of Hope and Glory," and "Knees Up Mother Brown"

From the 'surely you must be joking' department:
  • An anthem switch at the 2010 Commonwealth Games
  • A "month-long public vote" in the United Kingdom
    • Involving a whopping 1,896 people
  • A suggestion from Scotland
The Lemming is not making this up.
"Commonwealth Games 2010: Fran Halsall sings wrong England anthem"
guardian.co.uk (October 5, 2010)

"Fran Halsall stood on top of the podium, gold medal around her neck for the 50 metres buterfly, watching the St George's Cross being tugged up the flagpole. As the opening notes came through the Tannoy she opened her mouth and belted out the first words: 'Land of hop...' Hold on. Has somebody blundered? Halsall caught herself just in time and did a double take, then struggled to stop herself bursting into giggles, clenching her lips tight as a grin tugged at the corners of her mouth.

"It was not the organisers who were at fault – England have switched their anthem....

"...Team England did announce the decision back in May. It just seems no one was listening at the time. They put it to a 'public vote', though the poll was carried out by YouGov, who surveyed all of 1,896 people.

" 'The nation has spoken,' crowed England's Commonwealth Games marketing director, Duncan Lewis. 'The response from the public has been absolutely fantastic and we are delighted to accept Jerusalem as the anthem for England.' It was a majority vote but not overwhelming – 52.5% of 'the public' for Jerusalem, 32.5% for Land of Hope and Glory and only a lowly 12% for God Save the Queen. Presumably the remaining 3% were indifferent....

This reminds the Lemming of a joke about songs getting mixed up. The punch line involved "God Save the Weasel" and "Pop Goes the Queen." Mercifully, that's all I remember of the gag.

Last month, the BBC published a somewhat more restrained article on the anthem switch:
"Grimethorpe Colliery Band records anthem for Games"
BBC Aheffield &: South Yorkshire (September 16, 2010)

"The Grimethorpe Colliery Band from Barnsley is probably one of the world's most famous colliery bands.

"And now their playing will be heard by a truly international audience.

"The band has been asked to record a special version of the well-known hymn, 'Jerusalem'.

"The recording will be used at next month's Commonwealth Games in Delhi.

" 'Jerusalem' originally began as a short poem by William Blake but was later set to music by Sir Hubert Parry in 1916.

"It has been selected as an anthem to be played for English athletes following a month-long public vote set up by Commonwealth Games England...."

Let's see: that's a "month-long public vote" (BBC) involving "1,896 people." (guardian.co.uk) Oh, boy: The Lemming checked, and the United Kingdom population is around 61,113,205. (CIA World Factbook: United Kingdom) If I'm doing the math right, the "nation" that spoke was about 0.03% of the U.K. population. Putting it another way, that "month-long public vote" involved fewer than half the number of people who live here in Sauk Centre, Minnesota.

The next article gives a little background on what's involved in the song switch:
"Commonwealth Games diary: Now we all seem to be keen to change our tune"
(October 6, 2010)

"SCOTLAND is not the only team to have a new national anthem for the Games. Our change from Scotland The Brave to Flower Of Scotland has been mirrored by Team England, who have jettisoned Land Of Hope And Glory in favour of Jerusalem.

"This change is unlikely to find favour with Prime Minister David Cameron, who is due to visit Delhi before the end of the event. After all, while Land Of Hope And Glory is associated with the Conservatives and has traditionally been sung at the conclusion of their annual party conference, Jerusalem is very much a Labour movement air.

"Perhaps between now and the 2014 Games in Glasgow that nice Mr Clegg will be invited to come up with some compromise solution which will please every right-thinking English person. Knees Up Mother Brown might suit, but give us a day or two and we might come up with something even more apt...."

The Lemming wasn't familiar with "Knees Up Mother Brown." Lyrics of two versions are at International Lyrics Playground. More lyrics and authorship information are at Academic dictionaries and encyclopedias. (A word of caution: Even though Raffi sang one version of the song, the various lyrics may be interpreted in, ah, various ways.)
Finally, what seems to be a comedy of the Monty Python variety isn't the most important aspect of the 2010 Commonwealth Games. Not even close.

The Lemming does wonder, though, who thought they could keep the size of that "month-long public vote" out of public view.

And, perhaps more to the point, why an effort seems to have been made to present the results of that minuscule poll in terms like "The nation has spoken." (England's C.G. marketing director, Duncan Lewis, via guardian.co.uk)

This is the Information Age, after all: and that's another topic.

Related posts:

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

The History of Sausage - By a British Barbecue Company

"SAUSAGE HISTORY"
Oscar Enterprises

"The manufacture of sausages began over two thousand years ago, and it is still a growing industry. While some of its basic practices are almost as old as civilisation, the industry is constantly adopting new developments in processing in the light of later scientific and technical knowledge.

"Sausage has been an important item in man's diet for twenty centuries. The first recognisable mention of this meat food is found in a Greek play called 'The Orya,' or 'The Sausage,' written about 500 B.C. Thereafter the word for sausage occurs with frequency in Greek writings. It's also a favourite food of the Romans, at one time becoming so popular for festive occasions that it was placed under the ban of the early church.

"The modern word 'sausage' is derived from the Latin ~salsus~, meaning salted. The term was probably originally applied to cured or salted meat generally. In the days of old people did not have refrigeration to preserve their meat and so making sausage was a way of overcoming this problem. ..."

The Lemming lives in a mostly German-Irish community in central Minnesota, where we appreciate sausage - and beer. And more sausage. And sauerkraut.

The Lemming is getting hungry.

The Lemming notes that this history of sausage does not mention exactly how sausage was originally made. Since it's on a commercial website, dealing with food: there's probably a good reason for that.

And don't get the Lemming started on the subject of haggis.

Monday, September 27, 2010

Segway Boss, Dr. Frankenstein, and Getting a Grip

"Study: Segway Injuries on the Rise"
Health, CBS News (September 27, 2010)

"A new study about the safety of Segway transporters was released Monday, hours after Jimi Heselden, Segway's owner died after riding one of the motorized scooters off a cliff into a river.

"The study in the Annals of Emergency Medicine shows that injuries while riding Segway transporters are significant and on the rise.

"During the course of three years, researchers studied records of 44 patients who entered The George Washington University Hospital's emergency department with injuries sustained from Segway accidents...."

"...Only seven of those patients wore a helmet, which is not required by law while riding a Segway...."

Okay: injuries involving Segways are on the rise.

Is use of Segways on the rise, too? Good question: one that's not addressed in the article.

However, Segways -
  • Use scary stuff:
    • New
    • Technology
  • Are considered 'cool' by plain, ordinary people
    • Not just the 'right sort'
  • Actually do something about reducing urban congestion
    • What good's a crisis with a practical solution?
      • Solving problems isn't as angsty as complaining about them
No wonder Segways are a dire threat!

The Lemming has explained his sort of 'apathy' before.

Sensible Article, Silly Proposals

"Segway boss James Heselden dies after riding scooter off cliff in northern England"
news.com.au (September 28, 2010) (It's tomorrow in Australia by now)

"THE millionaire boss of the UK-owned company Segway died after he rode one of the firm's two-wheeled scooters over a cliff near his home in northern England, police confirmed last night.

"James William Heselden, 62, from Thrope Arch, died about 11:40am local time when he rode one of the Segway scooters off a cliff and into the River Wharfe in West Yorkshire, northern England.

"He was pronounced dead at the scene after his body was pulled from the water....."

Any death of this sort is a sad occasion: the Lemming will get to an article about Mr. Heselden at the end of this post.

Now, taking the standard-issue attitude of hyperventilated safety consciousness - with a liberal hefty sprinkling of technophobia - the Lemming proposes:
  • Segways Kill!
    • And should be banned
  • Cliffs Kill!
    • And should be leveled
  • Rivers Kill!
    • And should be drained
At the very least, this is proof that the River Wharfe is dangerous and should be drained, that West Yorkshire is a hazardous place for people and should be evacuated - and, of course, everybody everywhere should be clad in bubble wrap and locked in padded rooms?

The Lemming doesn't think so. But then, the Lemming is 'apathetic.'

Safety and the Lesson of Dr. Frankenstein

As is well known - or assumed without consideration in some circles - there are things which humanity was Not Meant To Do. Like:
  • Develop new crops
  • Fly
  • Get vaccinated for smallpox
  • Install lightning rods
We're long past the time when an author could sell many copies of a book warning of divine retribution, should the heathen habit of using lightning rods be continued.

Smallpox is extinct, thanks at least in part to vaccination programs. (WHO) Today there are still folks who are scared of vaccines, for one reason or another. A not-entirely-overlapping population are scared silly about new crops and farm animals.

As for airplanes being the work of the Devil: I haven't heard a joke about that for decades. My guess is that most folks have learned to live with the idea that people can fly through the air now.
Enter Frankenstein
Frankenstein, the fictional scientist who appeared in Mary Wollstonecraft (Godwin) Shelley's "Frankenstein | or The Modern Prometheus," is probably better known as the mad scientist of quite a number of movies.

Whatever the author's intention, Frankenstein and his creature seem to have become a sort of symbol of hubris, and a cautionary tale of what happens when we dabble in that which we ought to leave alone.

The Lemming is on the same page as the ancient Greeks: I think overweening pride is a bad idea. The problem is deciding where the line is, between pursuing an ambition and getting in over your head. I like the quest for knowledge: it's what a person does to get that knowledge, and how it's applied that can get us in trouble. And that's another topic in another blog.

Getting back to Frankenstein and that 19th-century bit of science fiction: it seems that quite a few folks - and not just the usual suspects - still think that there are things which Man Was Not Meant To Know. And that new things are dangerous.

Like riding Segways.

I don't doubt that Segways are dangerous. A stick is dangerous, even if it's not particularly sharp. You really can 'put your eye out' with one if you're not careful.

That doesn't mean that the Lemming thinks sticks should be banned.

Or Segways, or automobiles, or buckets. And, yes: buckets are deadly. ("Injury - a Risk at Any Stage of Life," CDC; "Baby Drowns in Bucket at South Side Home," NBC Chicago (September 19, 2010))

The Lemming thinks part of the reason that we don't see outcry against the dangers of unlicensed buckets is because buckets are a very old technology.

Segways, though, are still where automobiles were a few generations ago: largely in the hands of early adapters; and feared by folks who don't care for change. In the Lemming's opinion.

Jimi Heselden: We'll Miss You

"Tycoon who gave away £23m killed in scooter cliff plunge"
Yorkshire Post (September 27, 2010)

"TRIBUTES have been paid to a 'remarkably selfless' Yorkshire millionaire and philanthropist who died while out riding a two-wheeled electric Segway scooter which plunged off a 30ft cliff and into a river.

"Jimi Heselden, a former miner turned wealthy entrepreneur who owned the Segway company, was found in the river Wharfe at Boston Spa, near Wetherby, not far from his home in Thorp Arch.

"Police said there were no suspicious circumstances and Mr Heselden had died at the scene...."

From the sounds of it, James 'Jimi' Heselden was one of the 'good guys.' A man who knew how to make money - and how to handle it afterward.

But then, the Lemming thinks that charity is a good idea.

And that's yet another topic.

Related posts:

Friday, August 20, 2010

Bradford's Giant Rat? Coypu? If You Meet One: Does the Name Matter?

"Invasion of the Giant Rats"
Sun (U.K.) (August 19, 2010)

"HORRIFIED neighbours told yesterday how their homes are being invaded by giant rats - including a 30-INCH LONG monster that was shot dead.

"The rodents, twice the size of common types, are plaguing an estate in Bradford, West Yorks, often appearing in kitchens and lounges.

"It is feared some could be 'super rats' from South America.

"Pictured above is a monster 2½ft rat killed on the estate...."

Four other critters about the same size got away while Brandon Goddard was gunning that one down.

There seems to be a colony of those - things - in the area.

Which is a sort of good news / bad news thing.

The bad news is that folks living around there are sharing territory with rat-things that are bigger than some of their dogs.

The good news is that critter experts have something interesting to study.

"...Last night experts called the shot rat "extraordinary" and said the colony was worth investigating.

"Laura Drake, of the Mammal Society, speculated it could be a coypu - a South American rodent often referred to as a 'giant rat'.

"Coypus were thought to have been eradicated in Britain in a cull 20 years ago. But Laura said it was 'not impossible' there had been survivors...."

The Coypu look a bit like outsize rats: but where rats have our habit of eating just about anything, the coypu are plant-eaters. More about coypu:

Friday, July 30, 2010

Penguins? Quite British, Actually: The Books, That is

"Picking up Penguins for 75 years"
BBC (July 29, 2010)

"Tales about the man who founded Penguin 75 years ago, conjure up the image of an eccentric character from one of the publisher's books.

"Sir Allen Lane was the man who used a fairground slide to drop deliveries to his company (then based in a crypt) and came up with the Penguincubator - a vending machine for the firm's books to be installed on train platforms.

"Stories differ as to whether this machine was ever made, with some reports suggesting at least one machine was installed at Charing Cross Station in London...."

"...'When Allen Lane founded Penguin in 1935 he had a pretty simple, but pretty radical idea: make great literature available to everyone at an affordable price and for it to appeal not just to the wallet, but to literary taste and the eye, with beautifully designed jackets and style,' says Mr Makinson...."

75 years later, Penguin books are still selling: so that radical idea seems to have been a rather good one, after all.

Interestingly, Penguin books haven't been selling in Brazil: yet. Apparently that's going to change soon, too.

The BBC quotes Penguin's chief executive and chairman, John Makinson, on paperbacks and e-books: "There's also nothing cool about owning enormous quantities of e-books," which I'm taking a bit out of context.

Keep reading: "...'For the children's market, the iPad is fantastic. On the iPad in the US, there was only one book pre-loaded and that was our edition of Winnie The Pooh,' Mr Makinson adds...."

I rather suspect that Penguin books - virtual and otherwise - will be around for quite a while.

I'm even pretty sure that the codex will be around for quite a while, too: although we're almost certainly seeing a major shift toward data storage and retrieval technology that doesn't involve marks on physical pages. ("The Web Rewires Your Brain: Ain't That Great?" (July 2, 2010), "Data-Driven Art: For an 'Overwhelmed' 'Hive Mind???' " (January 27, 2010))

Friday, July 23, 2010

Stonehenge II: Woodhenge Found Near Stonehenge

"Archaeologists unearth Neolithic henge at Stonehenge"
BBC (July 22, 2010)

"The new "henge" is about 900m (2,950ft) from the giant stones

"Archaeologists have discovered a second henge at Stonehenge, described as the most exciting find there in 50 years.

"The circular ditch surrounding a smaller circle of deep pits about a metre (3ft) wide has been unearthed at the world-famous site in Wiltshire.

"Archaeologists conducting a multi-million pound study believe timber posts were in the pits.

"Project leader Professor Vince Gaffney, from the University of Birmingham, said the discovery was 'exceptional'.

"The new 'henge' - which means a circular monument dating to Neolithic and Bronze Ages - is situated about 900m (2,950ft) from the giant stones on Salisbury Plain...."

There's a short video embedded in the BBC article, which includes a very quick look at the wheeled scanners that researchers ran over the landscape around Stonehenge. The things look a little like lawnmowers.

This new henge seems to have a burial mound in its center.

Archaeologists don't always use shovels these days: which is good for the next set of researchers visiting a site, since whatever's buried stayed buried; and which often speeds up the process of finding out what's under the landscape.

Somewhat-related posts:More:

Sunday, July 18, 2010

Tour Operator Goes Broke, Leaves Brits Stranded

Or, 'you think you had a bad weekend?'

"Goldtrail collapse leaves Britons in Greece and Turkey
BBC (July 17, 2010)

"A British tour operator has collapsed leaving thousands of holidaymakers abroad, the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) has said.

"Greece and Turkey specialist Goldtrail, based in New Malden, south-west London, went into administration on Friday with an estimated 16,000 customers overseas.

"The CAA said it was arranging to fly customers home after their holidays and there were no more outbound flights...."

On a practical note, the BBC article has a telephone number that Goldtrail customers can call.

Looks like around 50,000 folks who had made travel arrangements through Goldtrail are left in Greece and Turkey, to drum up money for travel home, places to stay, and other expenses involved with having a vacation.

"...One traveller, Martin Plimmer, said he had booked his flights through Goldtrail and faced losing all the money spent on his accommodation if he couldn't find the finances to pay for new flights.

" 'We were told we would have to pay for any new flights and claim that back through the CAA as Goldtrail were ATOL-protected.

" 'Our predicament was however that if we couldn't afford the flights we would lose the £1500 that we paid for our all-inclusive hotel because it was through a different company.'..."

I learned a couple of new acronyms: ATOL, for Air Travel Organiser's Licensing; and CAA, for Civil Aviation Authority.

On a more positive note, it looks like European air travel is recovering from that Icelandic volcano's ash. ("Iceland, Volcano, Ash, Airline Cancellations: Here We Go Again" (May 16, 2010))

Friday, July 9, 2010

A Thought for the Day From Hamlet

"...There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy....
"

"Hamlet, Act 1. Scene V"
Shakespeare, via The Literature Network

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Churchill: Oh, the Cigar! Oh, the Horror!

I AM NOT MAKING THIS UP
"Spot the difference: How today's airbrushing PC censors decided Churchill could do without his cigar"
MailOnline (UK) (June 15, 2010)

"The face is instantly familiar, the two-fingered salute unmistakable.

But are these actually the same photograph of Sir Winston Churchill?

In the original photograph the war leader has his cigar gripped firmly in the corner of his mouth.

But in the other image - currently greeting visitors to a London museum - his favourite smoke has been digitally extinguished.

Which is a little embarrassing for the staff at the charitable trust, because the photograph features on a giant poster hanging above the museum's main door.

So just who did pinch the great man's Havana?...
"

There's a short list of folks who didn't play an obvious role in re-imagining Winston Churchill. So far, though, who should be given the - credit? - isn't at all clear:

"...But intriguingly the museum, which gives all profits to charity, declined to name who put together the display and, crucially, who enlarged the image for the poster...."

You'll have to read the rest of the article to get the MailOnline's take on this weirdness.


(from MailOnline, used w/o permission)
The doctored photo is the center top one: MailOnline's copy is larger than this thumbnail.

Winston Churchill? Never Heard of Him

Actually, I have. But given the emphasis on history that's been the norm for the last couple generations, a little background may be called for.

Winston Churchill wound up being Sir Winston Churchill before he died in 1965. He was England's Prime Minister during World War II. (those who haven't heard of that, either, will find a little about it in Churchill's bio)

When he took office, there was fairly good reason to think that German forces, carrying the German Chancellor's vision of a new and improved Europe with them, would shortly cross the English Channel and start remolding Great Britain into something acceptable to the National Socialist German Workers Party.

The British weren't, for the most part, all that keen on the prospect.

One of Churchill's best-known remarks, at least when they were generally known in the English-speaking world, was "I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat." That doesn't sound like the most uplifting thing to hear: but for a British public who had gotten used to hearing their leaders say the sort of thing that politicians do, it must have been a refreshing change of pace.

Germany didn't succeed in turning Europe into a fit place for 'Aryans,' by the way. But that's another story.

Naughty Winston / Nice Winston

That tidied-up photo of Winston Churchill reminds me of the way 'naughty' books were Bowdlerized in Victorian times; how General Custer wasn't portrayed as an ambitious doofus a half-century ago; and how important it was to keep up with the latest politically correct terminology the last time I did time in American academia.1

Let's take a look at Nice Winston and Naughty Winston.
Naughty Winston
I suppose I should have warned you. We're not used to seeing people smoking cigars, these days.

When Churchill was Prime Minister, we didn't know as much about the effects of chronic smoking on health. Well, on most people's health Winston Churchill lived into his nineties.

That isn't a peace sign he's making, by the way. Until the sixties, that two-fingered gesture meant 'V for victory.'

About smoking and health? There's a large body of evidence that smoking isn't a good idea. There are also some debatable claims, but for the most part folks who smoke stogies regularly don't live as long as Sir Winston.
Nice Winston
Credit where credit is due: whoever altered this photo did a pretty good job of making that cigar disappear.

I don't think it's a good idea to fake pictorial records like this - but from a technical point of view, that forgery was a good job.

What's the big deal? Let's take some of hypothetical examples from American history
George Washington
George Washington: first American president, among other things. And a dude who sported long hair.

Considering how hysterical 'real Americans' were about long hair on men, back in the sixties, it's a little surprising that George W. didn't get a makeover. I suppose they had more sense than to try.
Harriet Tubman
Harriet Tubman, you've probably heard of: if you're an American, and have been paying attention for the last few decades. She was an abolitionist, among other things.

If you're at all familiar with American culture: consider what would happen if someone took that photo, gave her a nose job and made her look like a white woman. Make that a white man. (I can - barely- imagine someone trying to justify a stunt like that on the basis of traditional role models.)

I would be rather upset, myself. She made a contribution to American history - and that's what she looked like.

Back to Winston Churchill: the Real One

Winston Churchill and the cigar? Okay, let's say cigars aren't particularly safe to smoke. Is that a good reason for making nice-nice with a photo? Winston Churchill helped pull the United Kingdom out of World War II. And he smoked a cigar.

Deal with it.

In a way, it's nice to know that do-gooder crackpots aren't an American monopoly.

Joking aside, The Lemming thinks there's an important lesson to be learned here. As the article says:

"The altered image was spotted by museum visitor David McAdam.

"He said: 'I pointed out this crude alteration to a museum steward who said she hadn't noticed the change before, nor had anyone else pointed it out.

" 'Viewing the now disfigured image reveals just how unhinged the vociferous anti-smoking lobby has become. So much for the notion that only communist tyrants airbrushed history.'..."

Sadly, it's not just the "vociferous anti-smoking lobby" - this sort of ideological distaste for unwanted realities goes back decades, and is by now a deeply cherished tradition in American academia, at least.

Related posts:More about traditional information gatekeepers, and the tribulations they're experiencing in the Information Age:
1 Times change - but people don't. Not all that much:

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Lemming Tracks: BP, Exxon, and the Walrus in the Parlor

"Exxon, Oil Companies Slammed for 'Carbon-Copy' Plans (Update1)"
Jim Efstathiou Jr. and Joe Carroll, Bloomberg BusinessWeek (June 15, 2010)

"Exxon Mobil Corp., ConocoPhillips, Chevron Corp. and Royal Dutch Shell Plc are as ill-prepared as BP Plc to halt and clean up an offshore oil spill because they all use “carbon copy” disaster plans, lawmakers said.

"Eight weeks after a drilling rig leased by BP exploded in the Gulf of Mexico, killing 11 workers and triggering the worst spill in U.S. history, executives from the companies sought at a House Energy Committee hearing to distance themselves from BP's practices that lawmakers said put profits before safety.

"Lawmakers faulted the four executives for disaster-response plans that would halt oil leaks at the sea floor using the same techniques that failed for BP at its Macondo well. The same firm wrote the plans and included references to making sure crude doesn't injure walruses, which don't live in the Gulf of Mexico...."

This embarrassing matter of the walruses of the Gulf, the Big Three automakers collapse, and the financial industry meltdowns (plural) are among the reasons that The Lemming is glad he didn't pursue a nice, smooth 'success track' in some major corporation, decades back.

Too many of those places, it seems, have too many nitwits in too many responsible positions.

I've explained before, that The Lemming is apathetic only in the sense that I don't care - passionately, blindly, irrationally - about the culturally-approved things.

One thing I don't like to see is daft decision-making. Particularly when it's done by someone who determines what a whole lot of other people do.

The 'related posts' at the end of this post are mostly from another blog, where I discuss (rant?) why I don't think that the executives who ran their companies into the ground should be rewarded and given a whack at doing it again.

Off on a Tangent About Congressional Wisdom

Congress is at it again, pulling oil company CEOs in and making speeches at them. If they left it at that, there'd be no harm in the time-honored custom of Congressional inquiries. It keeps members of Congress and established CEOs occupied. Besides giving both, I suppose, a sense of purpose, those inquiries also keep them out of mischief. For a while.

Problem is, Congress eventually goes back to dreaming up 'solutions,' and the CEOs go back to making the same kind of decisions that brought them to Capitol Hill in the first place.

I suppose it 'feels good' to think that bailing out anachronistic holdovers from the fifties will 'save the workers.' My view is that, for the automotive industry at least, there's a huge and steady demand for their product: and the people with good ideas who couldn't compete against the triumvirate of 800-pound gorillas will need to hire assembly line workers, clerical staffs, and all the rest that it takes to run a company.

And, quite possibly, not run their companies into the ground.

Back to the Walrus in the Parlor

"Walrus in the Parlor?" Folks who grew up speaking American English have probably heard about the elephant in the room / living room / parlor / whatever. The phrase means 'an obvious fact that nobody wants to acknowledge.' There's a pretty good writeup on the saying in Wikipedia. Moving along.

Those walruses in the BP plan to save wildlife in the Gulf of Mexico are probably going to haunt the company for years. My guess is that the wunderkind who's responsible for that plan is either experiencing a career change now - or is about to. I have difficulty imagining that British Petroleum got to be as big as it is by letting SNAFUS like that be routine.

BP executives may also decide that telling a drill crew to cut corners until they kill themselves is a bad idea. I hope so, anyway.

Another excerpt from that BusinessWeek article:

"...BP, the biggest Gulf of Mexico oil producer, made five 'questionable decisions' aimed at cutting costs and speeding completion of an overdue project before the disaster, Democratic Representatives Henry Waxman of California and Stupak wrote in a letter to Hayward released yesterday.

"Walruses in Plans

"Markey pressed the CEOs on why their safety plans for a Gulf spill described the effects on walruses. Two of the companies also incorporated contact information for a Florida marine researcher who died in 2005, Markey said...." ["Markey?" That's probably Representative Edward Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat. (AP, via MSNBC)]

I think there are several walruses in the parlor here, although they're not all in the same 'parlor:'
  • Safety on the cheap is dangerous
    • Particularly
      • On the ocean floor
      • A mile down
  • Contingency plans should not make the company filing them look ignorant
    • And the federal agency accepting them look incompetent
    • Duh
  • Any operation that involves large masses and a lot of energy is dangerous
    • Given time, there will be accidents
    • The idea is to lower the odds of something going wrong
    • Complete, perfect safety doesn't exist
  • Congress can't make everything better
What's a bit troubling about the BusinessWeek article is that it looks like BP got 'lucky,' and was the first company operating in the Gulf to have their weirdly inappropriate contingency plans revealed as badly-written fantasy.

I wrote "a bit troubling" because there's an opportunity now, for BP and all the rest to shape up:
  • Give nice retirement packages to the decision-makers who decided 11 people to death
    • And save more lives in other companies by doing the same for their own nitwits
  • Have someone with a little common sense
    • Look for stupid ideas in every operation:
      • Drilling
      • Pumping
      • Transporting
      • Storage
I think there's a chance that Exxon and all may wake up and make some changes before they decide themselves into BP's current position.

I also I think there's a chance that the White House and/or Congress may realize that ordering a halt to all Gulf drilling for the next two quarters isn't a good idea.

Remember: the newer, less accident-prone, rigs are portable, and their owners will take them elsewhere if the United States won't let them operate here. Which will not be good for the folks around the Gulf, who depend on those operations for their livelihood.

Maybe it would be 'nicer' if all offshore drilling were stopped forever - and nobody needed to work for a living - and all women were beautiful. But out here where most of us live, we need petroleum products. The walruses of the Gulf Coast will, I think, have to take their chances.

Sort-of-related posts:
More:

BP Oil Spill, Clean Beaches, and Maps

"Tracking the Oil Spill in the Gulf"
The New York Times (June 13, 2010)



"About the Oil Slick Areas Shown on the Map

"The 'estimated extent' of the oil slick is an estimate by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of where oil is mostly likely to go based on wind and ocean current forecasts, as well as analysis of aerial photography and satellite imagery...."

"...About the Estimates Used in the Chart

"The totals for the amount of oil spilled are calculated beginning from the initial explosion at 10 p.m. on April 20. While both oil and gas are leaking from the well, the estimates here are only for the amount of oil. BP announced on May 21 that the fluid leaking was roughly half oil, half natural gas...."

Back on The New York Times' page, the map is moderately interactive. Click on it, and it'll take you back, showing how the oil has spread.

If you want to maximize your horror at the total and utter devastation which Big Oil has wreaked on the walruses of the Gulf (discussed in a BP report), go back to the first weeks of the spill. Those gray areas were spreading fast.

Then.

Now, not so much.

This may sound like blasphemy, so brace yourself. Or, better yet, click to another post.

Still with me? Okay. Looks like folks who want to go to the Gulf and be horrified in person at the terrible oil spill may want to plan ahead:

"Currently Corpus Christi and Upper Padre Island beaches have NOT been affected by the recent oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. 'The oil slick remains at least 150 miles from Texas waters and is unlikely to spoil Texas beaches or wetlands,' according to Texas Land Commissioner Jerry Patterson...."
(VisitCorpusChristiTX.org)

BP Spill: Massive, Yes; Everywhere, No

Seriously? It's a massive spill, and will be very expensive to clean up. But maps on The New York Times' website, a phone call, and some checking around told me that there are vast swatches of the Gulf shores that aren't affected by the spill.

Which doesn't seem to be spreading as fast as it was. Nowhere near as fast.

Here are two maps, showing the the extent of the spill June 13, Sunday, and May 30, two weeks before that.


May 30, 2010


June 13, 2010
(from The New York Times, used w/o permission)

Beaches: Fouled and Otherwise

CNN ran this article yesterday:

"Gulf Coast beaches update"
CNN (June 14, 2010)

"Oil coming ashore on the Gulf Coast has tourists keeping a close eye on conditions. States and visitors bureaus are working hard to keep the public updated and reassure beach-bound travelers.

"Here are some of the latest updates from destinations affected by the oil disaster:

"Northwest Florida

"All of Florida's beaches remain open, according to Visit Florida, the state's tourism corporation. Scattered tar balls have been found from the Alabama-Florida state line east to Walton County...."

Like I said, call ahead. If someone comes to the Gulf Coast, hoping to be appalled at the utter devastation and hopelessness of it all - that earnest person may be sorely disappointed.

Yes, there are some beaches with oil on them:

"...Gulf Shores and Orange Beach, Alabama

"Gulf Shores and Orange Beach, Alabama, have experienced significant oiling, accoring to the Alabama Gulf Coast Convention and Visitors Bureau...."

Related posts:
More:

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

Lemming Tracks: BP, the Gulf of Mexico, Oil, and - Walruses?!

This could be filed under "YOU - HAVE - GOT - TO - BE - KIDDING!"

"BP's error-prone spill response plans overstate preparedness, understate dangers"
The Associated Press, via FOXNews (June 9 2010)

"Professor Peter Lutz is listed in BP's 2009 response plan for a Gulf of Mexico oil spill as a national wildlife expert. He died in 2005.

"Under the heading 'sensitive biological resources,' the plan lists marine mammals including walruses, sea otters, sea lions and seals. None lives anywhere near the Gulf.

"The names and phone numbers of several Texas A&M University marine life specialists are wrong. So are the numbers for marine mammal stranding network offices in Louisiana and Florida, which are no longer in service.

"BP PLC's 582-page regional spill plan for the Gulf, and its 52-page, site-specific plan for the Deepwater Horizon rig are riddled with omissions and glaring errors, according to an Associated Press analysis that details how BP officials have pretty much been making it up as they go along. The lengthy plans approved by the federal government last year before BP drilled its ill-fated well vastly understate the dangers posed by an uncontrolled leak and vastly overstate the company's preparedness to deal with one...."

It's not just British Petroleum. Some federal worker apparently signed off on a plan that seems to have included an explanation of how walruses in the Gulf of Mexico would be taken care of.

Walruses?!!

On the Gulf of Mexico?!!!

In a zoo, maybe. But you're as likely to see a wild walrus on the Alabama coast, as you are to see elephant herds roaming the plains of Minnesota. Or polar bears basking on the ice floes of Uganda.

How Could a Report Like That be Approved?

I suppose allowances should be made.

Federal employees are, I'm sure, mostly well-intentioned folks who are just trying to make a living. Over the decades, I've had pretty good experiences with federal employees.

However, the last time I applied for a job with the federal government, my application was weighed according to a well-defined point system. Some of the points came from how well my skills and background matched those of the job. But quite a few points came from factors that had nothing to do with job performance, like who my ancestors were.

BP, British Petroleum, is a British company. They probably employ Americans, but the outfit is, as the name says, British - with corporate headquarters in London. I wouldn't be terribly surprised if they had entrusted a vital report like that "walruses of the Gulf" thing to an expert. A nice, trusted, British expert. Someone whose residence was a place like Hillingdon Heath or South Oxney.

A proper Englishman might not readily appreciate the difference in scale between the British Isles and North America. There is considerably more distinction between coastal Alaska and the Gulf shore of Louisiana than there there is between Liverpool and Southampton.

Or, maybe BP intentionally filed a bogus report made with a dead man's help. Assuming, correctly, that it would be rubber-stamped by some federal employee who can't, in practice, be fired.

It Gets Better - or Worse

Back to that AP article:

"...In the spill scenarios detailed in the documents, fish, marine mammals and birds escape serious harm; beaches remain pristine; water quality is only a temporary problem. And those are the projections for a leak about 10 times worse than what has been calculated for the ongoing disaster.

"Billy Nungesser, president of Plaquemines Parish, La., says there are '3,000 acres (of wetlands) where life as we know it is dead, and we continue to lose precious marshland every day.'

"There are other wildly false assumptions. BP's proposed method to calculate spill volume based on the darkness of the oil sheen is way off. The internationally accepted formula would produce estimates 100 times higher.

"The Gulf's loop current, which is projected to help eventually send oil hundreds of miles around Florida's southern tip and up the Atlantic coast, isn't mentioned in either plan.

"The website listed for Marine Spill Response Corp. - one of two firms that BP relies on for equipment to clean a spill - links to a defunct Japanese-language page...."

I have nothing against Japan, per se. I can easily imagine that a London-based company operating in one of the former colonies might reasonably decide to contract some of the work out to a Japanese company. That's not the issue, as far as I'm concerned.

It's like the dead man who's supposed to have helped BP write that report. Japanese companies that I'm aware of, which deal with people in English-speaking countries, maintain English-language websites. Which, as a rule, are still online.

Listing a website that isn't in English - and which disappears by the time someone takes a hard look at the report - is just plain not prudent.

Who is More Foolish? The Fool, or the Fool Who Relies on Him?

I can, sort of, see BP's point of view. Their executives may, based on observations of America's federal employees, assumed that any hooey would do, as long as there were lots of pages in a report. Still, I think it's apparent that relying on federal foolishness to maintain a business's operations was - not prudent.

British Petroleum's execs should have realized that they were in a comparatively high-risk business - and that most Americans are not fools.

Also, that when something went wrong, those Americans would find out. We're not living in the 'good old days' when embarrassing little mistakes could be politely ignored or smoothed over. The 'good old boys' network of information gatekeepers doesn't have the monopoly it once had.

Which is fine by me.

Maybe BP Really Didn't Get It

I'd still like to think that British Petroleum isn't run by clueless nitwits who had no idea that one of their drilling operations might not work quite as it should.

Given the way they're trying another, bigger, cap for the broken drilling site: they may really want to get control of the mess they're making. They may even succeed.

And, given that the gusher is under a mile of water, and is the sort of problem we didn't have a century ago, I'm quite willing to assume that the task is difficult.

But that report? Who did they think they were going to fool, in the long run?
More:

Sunday, June 6, 2010

Jumping on the BP Oil Spill Bandwagon

A whole lot of folks have been writing about that huge oil spill - gusher, actually - under the Gulf of Mexico. It's a mess, in several senses of the word, and I figure it's time for me to do another post about it.

From recent news and blogs:
  • "Fake tweets slam BP"
    CNN (June 6, 2010)
    • "A fake Twitter account is skewering BP for its handling of the oil crisis. CNN's Josh Levs reports...."
  • "AP Top News at 1:55 p.m. EDT"
    The Associated Press (June 5, 2010)
    • "Driftwood and seashells glazed with rust-colored tar lined the surf along the Gulf Coast's once-pristine white sand beaches...."
  • "Coast Guard: BP collected 6,000 barrels of oil"
    USA Today (June 5, 2010)
    • "British Petroleum has collected 6,000 barrels of oil in the first 24 hours of pumping it from a leaking well up to a drill ship...."
  • "Cap Slows Gulf Oil Leak as Engineers Move Cautiously"
    The New York Times (June 5, 2010)
    • "Oil continued to gush from a runaway oil well in the Gulf of Mexico on Saturday as engineers worked to close the vents on a capping device they successfully lowered onto the gushing riser pipe late Thursday night...."
  • "Gulf oil spill: Cap starts doing its job, but officials remain cautious"
    Greenspace, Los Angeles Times blog (June 5, 2010)
    • "Efforts to contain the flood of oil into the Gulf of Mexico showed the first signs of progress as 6,000 barrels of oil were pumped to the surface after the fitting of a containment cap over the blown well, officials said Saturday, but it was an incremental step that offered no guarantees of long-term success...."
  • "Now confirmed: Oil's washing ashore at Baldwin County beaches (photos)"
    al.com (June 4, 2010)
    • "Baldwin County's first landing of oil has been confirmed in Gulf Shores...."
    • A tip of the hat to JimCantore, on Twitter, for the heads-up on this one
      • His comment: "Just sick about this:"
No matter how you look at it, this isn't good for the Gulf coast. At all.

I'm also pretty sure that we haven't heard the last of what went so hideously wrong at that British Petroleum drilling operation. There's no shortage of finger-pointing going on, some of it maybe legitimate; much of it, I suspect, business as usual.

The Lemming doesn't have a firm opinion about who's to blame for what - apart from the monumentally obvious 'something went wrong.'
More:
Unique, innovative candles

Visit us online:
Spiral Light Candle  • Find a Retailer
• Spiral Light Candle online store

Pinterest: From the Man Behind the Lemming

Top 10 Most-Viewed Posts

Today's News! Some of it, anyway

Actually, some of yesterday's news may be here. Or maybe last week's.
The software and science stuff might still be interesting, though. Or not.
The Lemming thinks it's interesting: Your experience may vary.
("Following" list moved here, after Blogger changed formats)

Who Follows the Lemming?

WebSTAT

Family Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory