Showing posts with label online business. Show all posts
Showing posts with label online business. Show all posts

Friday, December 21, 2012

Lemming Tracks: Instagram; Intellectual Property; and Underage Models

"Instagram says it now has the right to sell your photos"
Declan McCullagh, (December 17, 2012)

"In its first big policy shift since Facebook bought the photo-sharing site, Instagram claims the right to sell users' photos without payment or notification. Oh, and there's no way to opt out...."

"Privacy and Terms of Service Changes on Instagram"
blog.instagram.com (December 16, 2012)

"Our community has grown a lot since we wrote our original terms of service. To get things up to date for the millions of people now using Instagram, we’re bringing you new versions of our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

"Here are a few key updates:
  • "Nothing has changed about your photos’ ownership or who can see them.
  • Our updated privacy policy helps Instagram function more easily as part of Facebook by being able to share info between the two groups. This means we can do things like fight spam more effectively, detect system and reliability problems more quickly, and build better features for everyone by understanding how Instagram is used.
  • "Our updated terms of service help protect you, and prevent spam and abuse as we grow.
"This is just a small preview. Our new Privacy Policy and Terms of Service will be effective on January 16, 2013.

"We know these documents are a little dry, but they’re very important. Please take a moment to read through them so you keep feeling comfortable sharing your beautiful photos on Instagram."

So far, the Lemming couldn't see anything alarming. But Instagram included two links, and the Lemming thought Terms of Service might have something interesting.

The Lemming was right.

Ownership, Rights, and 'Under 18'

"Terms of Use"
instagram.com (effective on January 16, 2013)

"By accessing or using the Instagram website, the Instagram service, or any applications...

"...Rights
  1. "Instagram does not claim ownership of any Content that you post on or through the Service. Instead, you hereby grant to Instagram a non-exclusive, fully paid and royalty-free, transferable, sub-licensable, worldwide license to use the Content that you post on or through the Service, except that you can control who can view certain of your Content and activities on the Service as described in the Service's Privacy Policy, available here: http://instagram.com/legal/privacy/.
  2. "Some or all of the Service may be supported by advertising revenue. To help us deliver interesting paid or sponsored content or promotions, you agree that a business or other entity may pay us to display your username, likeness, photos (along with any associated metadata), and/or actions you take, in connection with paid or sponsored content or promotions, without any compensation to you. If you are under the age of eighteen (18), or under any other applicable age of majority, you represent that at least one of your parents or legal guardians has also agreed to this provision (and the use of your name, likeness, username, and/or photos (along with any associated metadata)) on your behalf...."
The Lemming has run into, and occasionally used, free services which pay their bills by using their users' content for marketing and advertising. That condition is no problem for the Lemming, since much of what the Lemming produces helps the Lemming - no matter where it's displayed.

Not everybody is like the Lemming, thankfully. Who needs a world full of flannel-clad lemmings? CNET's Declan McCullagh has a point: folks who don't want their photos used to sell some product probably don't want to use Instagram.

For the Lemming, it's an academic point. The Lemming doesn't use Instagram. Folks who do - probably want to re-think using that particular service.

The really interesting part, from the Lemming's point of view, is "...If you are under the age of eighteen (18)...." Using underage models for advertising, even with the safeguards Instagram has in that agreement, seems to be asking for trouble. In the Lemming's opinion.

Daft Contracts, the Government, and the Lemming

Springing surprises like Instagram's new Terms of Service on customers and clients is one thing. Folks can often find another business that isn't quite so clueless about what folks do - and don't - expect.

When a government starts, ah, 'protecting' folks - that's another topic.

(A tip of the hat to CNET, on Google+, for the heads-up on Instagram's new policy.)

Related posts:

Tuesday, May 31, 2011

Stained Glass CD

"#5 Mansion Glass Photos"
bigcartel.com

"117 photographs of finished windows by the Mansion Glass Company in all shapes and sizes. Drawings are nice, but finished windows really show the unique beauty of stained glass. ... A useful tool for you and your clients."

There's a higher-resolution image of that particular example, but to get at the rest you'd have to buy the CD - for about $25, plus (probably) shipping and handling. The Lemming didn't check to see how much that would be.

The CD's description is aimed at someone who wants to impress clients: but it seems like something that would be fun to have for someone who likes to look at stained glass. And has $25-plus dollars to spend.

The Lemming isn't going to buy that CD - but it's still nice to look at that picture.

Related posts:

Tuesday, May 3, 2011

Lemming Tracks: Bad News From Sony; and Getting a Grip

Sony is in the news again. Maybe you remember the trouble with Sony Playstation's network service, where:
  • The network went down
  • And stayed down
  • Without explanation
    • Pretty much
Then, like the punchline in a campus coffee shop story, Sony mentioned that mailing address, credit card information, and other personal data for lots of Sony Playstation customers had been stolen - - -

- - - Wait for it - that wasn't the punch line - here it comes - and that Sony would get back to their customers if there was something to be concerned about.

Coming on top of the Toyota SNAFU(s), and the none-too-well-handled communication about TEPCO's Fukushima reactor problems: What happened to Sony might have had someone saying, 'how could it get worse?'

It got worse.

25,000,000 Users Compromised - That's a Lot of Zeroes

"Sony Hacked Again; 25 Million Entertainment Users' Info at Risk"
Game | Life, Wired (May 2, 2011)

"It's bad news piled on top of bad news for Sony.

"Hackers may have stolen the personal information of 24.6 million Sony Online Entertainment users, the company said on Monday. More than 20,000 credit card and bank account numbers were also put at risk. This is in addition to the recent leak of over 70 million accounts from Sony's PlayStation Network and Qriocity services.

" 'We are today advising you that the personal information you provided us in connection with your SOE account may have been stolen in a cyberattack,' Sony wrote in a statement on its website on Monday.

"Sony Online Entertainment is a division of the company that publishes online multiplayer games like the recently released DC Universe Online. Sony turned off all SOE game services Monday after it learned of the intrusion.

"Sony said that the compromised personal information includes customers' names, addresses, e-mail addresses, birth dates, gender, phone numbers, logins and hashed passwords.

"Also at risk are the credit card numbers and expiration dates of 12,700 non-U.S. customers, plus 10,700 direct debit records from customers in Austria, Germany, Netherlands and Spain, containing bank-account numbers, customers' names and addresses. This information was stored in what Sony said was an 'outdated database from 2007.'..."

The good news, from the Lemming's point of view, is that Sony seems to have realized that issues like this won't go away if they're ignored. Also, that folks who like using Sony products - also like to be told when there's trouble.

It's a 'trust' thing, in the Lemming's opinion. Also common sense.

Now, more about what Sony's doing:

"Sony Apologizes, Explains How Hackers Stole PlayStation Personal Data"
Associated Press, via FoxNews.com (May 2, 2011)

"Sony executives bowed in apology Sunday as they explained how hackers took personal data of 77 million accounts on the online PlayStation service, including 10 million credit card accounts that may have been compromised.

" 'We deeply apologize for the inconvenience we have caused,' said Kazuo Hirai, chief of Sony Corp.'s PlayStation video game unit, who was among the three executives who held their heads low for several seconds at the company's Tokyo headquarters in the traditional style of a Japanese apology.

"Hirai said parts of the service would be back this week and that the company would beef up security measures. But he and other executives acknowledged that not enough had been done in security precautions, and promised that the company's network services were under a basic review to prevent a recurrence.

"Hirai said the FBI and other authorities had been contacted to start an investigation into what the company called 'a criminal cyber attack' on Sony's data center in San Diego, Calif.

"Sony said account information, including names, birth dates, email addresses and log-in information, was compromised for players using its PlayStation Network. Hirai asked all users to change their passwords....

The Lemming will be back, later in this post, with someone's advice about online security. As usual, it's mostly just common sense. And the Lemming will get back to that.

Hirari, Sony Corp.'s PlayStation video game unit chief, is in an unenviable position, in the Lemming's opinion. He knows that something went seriously wrong - doesn't know how bad it is, yet - and has decided to open up about what he does, and does not, know. A prudent decision, in the Lemming's opinion.

Back to that article.

"...Hirai reiterated what the company said last week -- that even though it had no direct evidence the data were even taken, it cannot rule out the possibility.

"He said data from 10 million credit cards were believed to be involved, and that Sony still does not know whether information was stolen.

"Sony has added software monitoring and enhanced data protection and encryption as new security measures, he said. The company said it would offer "welcome back" freebies such as complimentary downloads and 30 days of free service around the world to show remorse and appreciation...."
(FoxNews.com)

The situation is bad - and the Lemming is glad that no member of the Lemming's household deals directly with Sony.

Still, it really could be worse. As far as the Lemming's heard, nobody's data has actually been used with criminal intent - or, rather, that we haven't heard about credit card fraud or identity theft coming from this SNAFU.

But, let's keep a happy thought. So far, Sony's started being fairly open about what's happening: and the really sensitive stolen data seems to be somewhat outdated.

Now, about what to do if when your data is stolen:

So Your Data's Stolen? You've Got Company

"You've Been Hacked, Now What?"
John R. Quain, Personal Tech, FoxNews.com (May 3, 2011)

"You're going to get hacked. And no matter how careful you think you are, the truth is there's nothing you can do to stop it.

"Recent events should make it clear to anyone who uses electricity that eventually some one will make off with your personal data -- not from your computer, but from someone else's. While two companies, Apple and Google, have been caught tracking customers and not being exactly forthcoming about it, other major companies, most notably Sony, have been deliberately hacked.

"Sony's network is so seriously compromised, in fact -- including possibly birth dates, credit card numbers, and passwords of customers -- that it's likely to be offline for at least two weeks. And just a few weeks ago, Epsilon, a company that sends out billions of e-mails for companies such as Target, Best Buy, Citigroup, and more admitted it too had been hacked.

"Other breeches are due to human error, lost laptops, and digital misadventures. Worse yet, many online businesses deliberately sell your personal data. Most claim it's for innocuous -- but extremely annoying -- marketing purposes. Others claim that the information is aggregated so they can't pin information to you personally.

"What harm could it do? Quite a bit, it turns out...."

The Lemming was somewhat unimpressed by the author's citing TomTom's 'admission' "that it had sold anonymous traffic and speed data from users to local governments, whose police departments used the information to set up speed traps." Possibly because the Lemming remembers old-school speed traps, where municipalities in effect hid traffic signs and shook down travelers.

Using demographic data to determine where folks beak the law, on average? Heavens, next thing you know, they'll be watching to see if you take stuff out of stores without paying for it.

Sorry about the sarcasm: the Lemming doesn't have much time for the 'I got caught and it's not fair' sort of 'privacy' concerns. And that's almost another topic.

Back to that article:

"...What can you do about it? The first step is acceptance.

" 'People should just assume their personal information is exposed everywhere,' said Tom Oscherwitz, chief privacy officer at ID Analytics, which assesses the fraud risk and creditworthiness of individuals.

"The second step is independence: Don't expect any one to tell you when information about you has been stolen. Businesses aren't always required to divulge a data breach, so to avoid embarrassment, they often don't. One expert told me that of nearly 100 data breeches at U.S. companies so far this year, less than 5 percent have been reported.

"The last step is to complain to companies whenever there's a leak. Business will take notice. Just witness how Facebook has had to backtrack on its privacy settings several times because of the uproar from users.

"Some analysts suggest that letting people opt out -- like those 'do not call' phone lists -- could help solve the problem. But you simply cannot opt out of everything: banks, phone companies, stores, which is where the trouble starts...."

That last point has a crucial phrase in it, in the Lemming's opinion: "could help." It's unlikely - putting it mildly - that any one approach will be the absolutely perfect solution to all online security issues.

On the other hand, the Lemming has been using the 'opt out' option whenever it's offered. Which, along with a pretty good email service (the Lemming uses GoDaddy's email that comes with website hosting packages), seems to have dramatically cut down spam in the inbox. Totally eliminated for all time? No. Cut down, yes.

The Lemming's Notions, For What They're Worth

The Lemming is not a security expert, and makes no claims about the practicality of these ideas. The Lemming accepts no responsibility if you read this. Do not play in traffic.

That should be enough of a disclaimer: but you never know.

Anyway, the Lemming doesn't do all that much when it comes to online security. Not in terms of ultra-sophisticated software and paranoid procedures.

On the other hand, the Lemming does:
  • Have one (1) credit card account
    • Compares the monthly bill with actual purchases
      • Investigates possible discrepancies
  • Does not respond to incoming solicitations
    • Not even that request from the Grand Poobah of Boogabooga
There's a little more to it: but the basic idea is 'KISS' (Keep It Simple, Stupid; or Keep It Stupidly Simple, if you prefer).

Also, the Lemming acts, whenever possible, as if any information left online is written on a postcard - available for anybody who's interested to read.

Blaming 'Them' - or Getting a Grip

Let's see if you can guess who the Lemming thinks is 'really' behind the Sony SNAFU:
  1. Japan
  2. Communists
  3. Big Oil
  4. Space-alien, shape-shifting, lizard-men
  5. Big Cheese
  6. The Jews
  7. Big Peanut
  8. Yankee Imperialism
  9. None of the above
If you guessed "#9, None of the above," you're a perceptive judge of the Lemming. If you guessed "#4 Space-alien, shape-shifting, lizard-men," "#5 Big Cheese," or "#7 Big Peanut," you may be spending more time reading the Lemming's blogs than you should. Or have an awfully good memory.

A little more seriously, the Lemming hasn't run into any of the 'it is the fault of' nonsense that followed Japan's March disaster, and Haiti's earthquake the year before. For which the Lemming is duly grateful.

Every culture, nation, whatever, seems to have a few folks who need to blame someone else for what they don't like. Just who 'they' are varies - a lot - but the basic pattern may be one of those 'universals.'

Finally, the Lemming didn't make up the lizard-men conspiracy theory: but Big Cheese and Big Peanut are, as far as the Lemming knows, originals.

So: if someone tells you that rising gas prices, the national debt, and acne, are all the fault of Big Cheese - you heard it first here.

Somewhat-related posts:
The Lemming, on Japan's earthquake/tsunami/aftermath experience:

Monday, August 23, 2010

Making a 'Super Password'

"How to create a 'super password'"
John D. Sutter, CNN (August 20, 2010)

"Say goodbye to those wimpy, eight-letter passwords.

"The 12-character era of online security is upon us, according to a report published this week by the Georgia Institute of Technology.

"The researchers used clusters of graphics cards to crack eight-character passwords in less than two hours.

"But when the researchers applied that same processing power to 12-character passwords, they found it would take 17,134 years to make them snap.

" 'The length of your password in some cases can dictate the vulnerability,' said Joshua Davis, a research scientist at the Georgia Tech Research Institute.

"It's hard to say what will happen in the future, but for now, 12-character passwords should be the standard, said Richard Boyd, a senior research scientist who also worked on the project...."

According to the CNN article, the researchers chose the number 12 for their recommended password length because they think it's a good balance between convenience and security.

Eventually, we may get really long passwords.

"...Here's one suggested password-sentence from Carnegie Mellon University:

" 'No, the capital of Wisconsin isn't Cheeseopolis!'..."

That'll have to wait until the security systems websites use will handle characters other than letters of the alphabet and numbers: like commas, apostrophes, and blank spaces.

The Lemming must be using some of the better-run websites: I was surprised to learn that a fair number of places online won't accommodate long passwords.

The Lemming Applauds Himself: But You Might Find It Useful

Me? I've been using 'long' passwords, a dozen or so characters long, for years. They're not all that hard to remember, since I use a pattern. I have three parts for each password. One's a word that isn't in most dictionaries, the other involves a number that's easy for me to remember, and the third is very mnemonic - generally having something to do with the website or service I'm logging into.

If all I relied on was the mnemonic part, I could be hacked fairly easily. All three together? I'm not sure how long it'd take for a program to run through enough combinations to 'guess' the right one. I'm not worried, though: the places I go generally limit the number of times I'm allowed to make a mistake before having to wait and visit the place later.

The CNN article does a pretty good job of discussing password security: including how to deal with the issue of remembering your passwords.

One of the solutions seems to be a disaster waiting to happen, as the author concedes:

"...A website called Password Safe will store a list of passwords for you, but Boyd and Davis said it may still be possible for a hacker to obtain that list...."

There are other solutions: including physical gadgets you can carry around with you.

The Lemming's opinion is that the best approach to password security is to work out a system that
  • You can remember at 2:00 a.m.
  • Produces
    • Different password for every site
    • Long passwords
    • Passwords with letters and numbers
  • Doesn't involve your birthday, or other fact that others know about you
  • Isn't on a sticky note stuck to your monitor
Related posts:

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Google, China, and Keeping Up With the News

"Google-China move hurts businesses, academics"
CNN (March 23, 2010)

"Businesses and universities could be substantially affected by the departure of Google from China.

"Most of the country's nearly 400 million Internet users may not be affected by the closure. But academics, university students and other researchers rely heavily on Google's search services to access information not available through Chinese search engines, like Baidu.com, China's most popular search portal. Small businesses that depend on Google applications such as Google Docs and Gmail may also suffer, analysts said.

"A recent survey of more than 700 Chinese scientists conducted by the journal Nature found that 80 percent regularly use Google to search for academic papers while 60 percent said they use the site to stay on top of new research...."

Oops. By the time this article was posted (3:58 p.m. EDT), ZDNet and others were discussing recent developments. It's so hard to keep up, these days.

I see the point: academics and small business operators who depend on Google services would be hurt if Google won't cooperate with the Chinese leadership's preference that the masses be fed 'correct' information. On the other hand, I think Google made a reasonable choice. They've got their reputation to consider, and playing censor for a workers' paradise wouldn't improve their image. In many circles, anyway.

Related post:

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Google, China, Censorship, Compromise: "Totally Wrong;" or, Not

"Google decides to stay in China after all"
ZDNet (March 23, 2010)

"In a compromise move, Google announced they will not abandon the China market after all. Instead, they will move their servers and domain name to Hong Kong, while keeping their developers and sales personnel where they are now on the mainland.

"Google's Hong Kong site will now offer uncensored search results in simplified Chinese for mainlanders, and in traditional Chinese for Hong Kong residents. Visitors to google.cn were already being redirected to google.com.hk on Tuesday morning. 'We believe this new approach [is] a sensible solution to the challenges we've faced,' said David Drummond, senior vice president of Corporate Development, on the Google blog Monday. 'It's entirely legal and will meaningfully increase access to information for people in China.'

"Not surprisingly, China sees things differently. According to the official Xinhua News Agency the head of the Internet Bureau called Google's actions 'totally wrong,' and said that 'Google has violated its written promise it made when entering the Chinese market by stopping filtering on its searching service.' The official also denied responsibility for a recent spate of cyber attacks. '[We] express our discontent and indignation to Google for its unreasonable accusations and conduct.'..."

China: Inter-Dynastic Periods Never Were Very Tranquil

Before anything else, some background about my view of China. I've been a historian, and realize that the position of China in the 8th through early 20th century - particularly from about 1839 to 1949 - is an unusual one for the Middle Kingdom. Here in America, we've heard quite a lot about the Opium Wars (disgraceful situation): not so much of the efforts of the Abbasid Caliphate to hack their way into the minds and hearts of the Tang Dynasty. But that's another topic.

I think there's a good chance that China may resume its position as a major landmark on the world's cultural, economic, and political landscape - and not as the anachronistic hodge-podge of ancient culture, foreign ideologies, all run by people who (in my view) are desperately trying to reconcile their notion of an ideal state to awkward realities.
"...I'm glad to hear that Hong Kong isn't, ah, quite as 'protected' as the masses in the rest of China. I suspect that the party leaders in Beijing realize, at some level, that it wouldn't be a good idea to choke the intellectual and financial life there.

"But that's another topic.

"I'm somewhat impressed that Google's willing to buck the system in the only remaining major worker's paradise on the planet. Not terribly surprised, though: too many people know what's going on in China and Google has a reputation to lose. We don't always call it 'losing face' in the West, but the old-fashioned idea of having values and sticking by them apparently hasn't been entirely lost....
("Google Stops Censoring Service: And This is News" (March 22, 2010))
"There's More to China Than Censorship and Porno Spam
"...I'm still getting 'spam' comments - and they're still very often in Chinese.

"If I didn't know more about China's culture and history, it would be easy to get the impression that there wasn't much more to the country, than naughty chat rooms and young women just aching to be exploited.

"China's gotten through inter-dynastic periods before. I think the chances are pretty good that the Middle Kingdom will emerge from this one, too, with a stable and vibrant society. Which is definitely another topic."
(Google Pulling Out of China? I've Heard Worse News" (March 14, 2010))

Back to Google, China, and Managing the Masses

"Censorship" is a hot-button word for many people. Understandably. I'm against it, by the way.

I also realize that when one group has control of most information channels, there's a real temptation to filter out things that are embarrassing to the group that's on top - or doesn't fit their world view.

For example, I'm old enough to remember when rock music and women wearing slacks were - according to one group - Satanic; and the dying gurgles of McCarthyism.

That was then, this is now, and there's a different lot in charge. They don't seem to like opposition any more than most folks. Remember when cable television was "divisive?" I do. Now it's the Internet. And those upstart news networks. (More: "What is an Information Gatekeeper?," Another War-on-Terror Blog (August 14, 2009))

China's leaders are, in a way, in an unenviable position. They are committed to an ideology which is not only foreign to their culture, but in my view doesn't work very well. Not when the masses are human beings.1 It's not that I sympathize with them: but I think I understand why they don't want their subjects to know too much about the outside world.

It could be called "protecting the masses from foreign lies" or something else euphemistic. I think what China's leaders are doing is censorship.

And I think Google has done a pretty good job (for now) of balancing their reasonable (in my view) desire to make a profit and their (again in my view) admirable desire to not cooperate with state control of information. Under the circumstances, I think that China's official view that Google is "totally wrong" shows that the company is on the right track.

China isn't Alone

On the whole, I like living in America, but I'm not an American chauvinist. Over the years (decades, centuries) this country has been - imperfect. ("United States of America: 232 Years in the Freedom Business," Another War-on-Terror Blog (July 3, 2008))

Not all that long ago, I think we had a very close call, when a strange alliance of interest groups had a shot at 'protecting' the rest of us from the Wicked, Wicked Web. ("Odd Allies: Opposition to Waterboarding and Web Censorship," Another War-on-Terror Blog (March 9, 2008))

When someone makes emotional appeals like 'save the children!,' I get - cautious. Which is definitely another topic.

Related posts:More, about my take on emotions, in other blogs:1 In my youth, both socialism and communism were attractive ideas. I soon realized that they didn't work well in human societies. Maybe if we were more like mole rats, psychologically.

They look good on paper, though.

Monday, March 22, 2010

Google Stops Censoring Service: And This is News

"Google Stops Censorship, Making Block by China Likely (Update1)"
Brian Womack, via Bloomberg (March 22, 2010)

" (Adds Chinese government comments in eighth paragraph.)...

"Google Inc., following through on a pledge to stop censoring search results in China, began serving mainland Chinese users via its unfiltered Hong Kong site, a move that could prompt the government to block the service.

"The company began redirecting traffic from its Google.cn site to Hong Kong, a part of the country that isn't subject to censorship laws. The move, which escalates a two- month dispute with the government over censorship, was 'totally wrong,' the official Xinhua news agency said.

"By relying on Hong Kong, Google is trying to find a way to fight censorship laws while still keeping a presence in mainland China. The approach may not work for long because the government will probably block the site, called Google.com.hk, just as it has before with the main Google.com page, said Ben Schachter, an analyst at Broadpoint AmTech Inc. in San Francisco...."

I'm glad to hear that Hong Kong isn't, ah, quite as 'protected' as the masses in the rest of China. I suspect that the party leaders in Beijing realize, at some level, that it wouldn't be a good idea to choke the intellectual and financial life there.

But that's another topic.

I'm somewhat impressed that Google's willing to buck the system in the only remaining major worker's paradise on the planet. Not terribly surprised, though: too many people know what's going on in China and Google has a reputation to lose. We don't always call it 'losing face' in the West, but the old-fashioned idea of having values and sticking by them apparently hasn't been entirely lost.

I'm getting off-topic. Following contemporary mores for a moment, I'll blame my environment: specifically a sleep-deprived weekend. ("Lemming Tracks: Back to Work" (March 22, 2010))

Besides, in strictly economic bottom-line terms, Google may have decided that it's better to lose a few bucks by being banned in China, than dropping a bundle in lost revenue everywhere else. Google is an 800-pound gorilla, but there are other online businesses with similar services.

These are interesting times.

Related posts:

Sunday, December 6, 2009

About Google, Change, and News

"Nothing endures but change."
(Heraclitus, 540 BC - 480 BC)

Or, 'change happens: Deal with it.'

"UPDATE 1-Google CEO says not to blame for news media woes"
Reuters (December 3, 2009)
"News search ads a "tiny fraction" of Google revenue
"Publishers need to provide free and paid access to news (Adds more comments from Schmidt and background)

"Google Inc (GOOG.O) is not to blame for the news industry's problems but is committed to playing a role in helping struggling publishers survive the transition to the online age, CEO Eric Schmidt said.

"Publishers need to explore new ways to make money from news on the Web, including the traditional advertising-based model as well as subscription-based access to content, Schmidt wrote in an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal.

" 'With dwindling revenue and diminished resources, frustrated newspaper executives are looking for someone to blame,' he wrote in the article published on Thursday...."

"...Developing new technology that makes it easier to reach readers and keeps readers engaged longer will be important for publishers, he said.

"Google is the world's largest search engine with roughly $22 billion in annual revenue...."

And traditional, old-school ink-on-paper newspapers aren't doing as well as they were, back in the sixties and seventies.

'Obviously' someone's to blame. Equally 'obviously,' from the editors' point of view, it can't possibly be their loyalty to late-19th and early-20th century information technology. And, it seems to me, philosophies. Human nature being what it is, it's easier to feel that it's the fault of these here newfangled upstarts. Like Google. Instead of taking a long, hard look at what's happened since the "good old days."

Maybe I'm being unfair.

On the other hand, I've been reading the news pretty regularly for over forty years. And, unlike what seems to be the case for at least some papers, I've noticed that - metaphorically speaking - Woodstock is history. This quite simply isn't the sixties any more. It isn't even the seventies.

These days I use Google extensively. I'd be happy to use the indexing and search routines that many information providers - news and otherwise - make available. Problem is, sometimes they simply don't work. And when they do, they're typically nowhere near as effective as the Google software.

No surprises there. Google got to be the 800-pound gorilla of the search services because it works. Other services, like Yahoo!, have their fans. And, they do a pretty good job. 'Nuf said.

Here's a link to that Wall Street Journal op-ed, and an excerpt:

"How Google Can Help Newspapers"
Opinion, The Wall Street Journal (December 3, 2009)
"Video didn't kill the radio star, and the Internet won't destroy news organizations. It will foster a new, digital business model"
By ERIC SCHMIDT

"It's the year 2015. The compact device in my hand delivers me the world, one news story at a time. I flip through my favorite papers and magazines, the images as crisp as in print, without a maddening wait for each page to load.

"Even better, the device knows who I am, what I like, and what I have already read. So while I get all the news and comment, I also see stories tailored for my interests. I zip through a health story in The Wall Street Journal and a piece about Iraq from Egypt's Al Gomhuria, translated automatically from Arabic to English. I tap my finger on the screen, telling the computer brains underneath it got this suggestion right.

"Some of these stories are part of a monthly subscription package. Some, where the free preview sucks me in, cost a few pennies billed to my account. Others are available at no charge, paid for by advertising. But these ads are not static pitches for products I'd never use. Like the news I am reading, the ads are tailored just for me. Advertisers are willing to shell out a lot of money for this targeting.

"This is a long way from where we are today. The current technology - in this case the distinguished newspaper you are now reading - may be relatively old, but it is a model of simplicity and speed compared with the online news experience today...."

As Google's CEO, Mr. Schmidt obviously has a rather well-defined point of view in this matter. Even so, I think he makes some good points.

I'm inclined to think, though, that there's more to the changing face of how people get their news, than new technology.

Traditional, old-school news media in America is, in my view, still operating under the assumptions that Yankee gentlemen of the New England states in general, and the upper crust of New York City in particular, are the standard-bearers of American culture.

Although traditional news and entertainment media have rather magnanimously consented to recognize the newer centers of culture, like Los Angeles and San Francisco, as worthy of note - a home town paper like The New York Times is able to present itself as America's 'newspaper of record.' And be taken seriously by the editors of other papers. (October 21, 2008, in another blog)

Again, maybe I'm being unfair. But I don't think so.

Change is always an awkward process - and often difficult. But, it happens. We're going through a lot of change these days. I'm a bit sympathetic with people whose world revolves around technologies and assumptions of past generations. I'm about as old as some old-school editors and publishers, and remember when television network news was the up-and-coming new power in the culture.

But, happily for me, I didn't get stuck in a traditional career.

That made it possible for me to pay attention to new technologies, among other things. Someone who's been stuck in an office in lower Manhattan, running a good old-fashioned news department wouldn't have had my opportunities.

This isn't Very Apathetic: What Gives?

I've explained the name of this blog before: Related posts:

Thursday, July 30, 2009

'About Us' - Why It's Important, How to Design Yours

"The Essence Of About Us Page With 12 Captivating Showcases"
Oneextrapixel (July 31, 2009) (I know, but that's what the date stamp says.)

"The previous post about Establishing a Brand for your site is one of the many methods to build trust and establish a relationship with customers. This post covers another way of building trust, and that through the About Us page.

"Have you wanted to find out more about a particular website but there is just not enough information for you? About Us page might just be an ordinary page however its significance should not be overlook.

"It is a page that provides information about the company or the people behind the web site, including basic real-world information, such as mailing address, phone number, and fax number, as well as background information on the company and the people in the company. This pattern describes how to organize this information in the About Us pages of your website...."

I'm pretty sure, judging from syntax in the second paragraph, that whoever wrote this post did not speak English while growing up. Don't let that bother you! The post is clearly written, with a very sufficient number of illustrations.

This is a pretty good introduction into the whats, hows, and whys of 'About Us' pages, with examples from Google, Us, MailChimp, and other more-or-less well known outfits.

The post is divided into sections: "What Information Should Your About Us Page Contain?" and "12 Captivating About Us Showcases". The latter is worth a visit, just for its eye-candy value, I think: but I did 10 years in graphic design, and may find this sort of thing more interesting than you will.

Overall, this post won't tell you absolutely everything you need to know for designing you own 'About Us' page - but I think it's a pretty good place to start.
A tip of the hat to yellownerd, on Twitter, for the heads-up on this post.

Monday, July 27, 2009

Ustream's Watershed Online Broadcasting Beta Available

Watershed
Powered by USTREAM

"Watershed is the private label version of Ustream™s proven and chosen Flash-based live, interactive broadcasting platform. Ustream™s technology has powered live broadcasting for Barack Obama's campaign website as well as for numerous other high-profile partners. With Watershed, customers will be able to broadcast live on the Internet using a fully customizable player with a variety of different features and options including chat, privacy, and analytics. The product is an all-in-one, easily deployed self-serve solution for both large and small organizations. By using Watershed, customers will be able to build genuine communities and relationships around a shared online experience...."

Watershed sounds like the best thing since sliced bread - and probably is an impressive service. I use Ustream's older system, by the way.

When you get into the Terms of Service, you'll discover that Watershed is a beta version: "...Watershed Services and Watershed Content may not operate properly, be in final form or fully functional; ... may contain errors, design flaws or other problems; ... may result in unexpected results ...."

That sort of thing is why I read TOS before signing up for something - particularly if I'm going to pay for it.

That said, I've used Ustream's non-Watershed service since July 1, 2009: and am very satisfied with it's performance. Demands on my browser put a bit of a strain on my five-year-old comptuer's resources, but it's a huge step up from what was making my webcam go before that. (Small Town America: Minnesota: "... there's nowhere else on earth that I would rather be")

From a quick look at Watershed Elements, it looks like using Watershed doesn't require programming experience - although you have the option of designing your own broadcaster, using the Watershed logic for framework operations. All that takes is Flash/ActionScript3 programming experience.

The pricing looks reasonable: starting at $49.00 a month. That's out of my range, this year, but not every business has the sort of budget I do.

Overall, Watershed looks like something worth looking into for online interactive broadcasting.

Thursday, May 21, 2009

$20,000 Kobelco Digger Auctioned to 3-Year-Old

"Toddler buys $20,000 digger on TradeMe"
stuff.co.nz (May 21, 2009)

"Three-year-old Pipi Quinlan bought a $20,000 Kobelco digger on auction website TradeMe, prompting immediate damage control by her mum when her purchase was revealed.

"Most parents are used to little ones sneaking treats into the supermarket trolley, but Pipi's deal must take the cake.

"Parents Sarah and Reid Quinlan, of Stanmore Bay, were astonished to wake one morning to find Pipi had bought the huge excavating digger in a TradeMe auction...."

Good news: The Quinlans don't have to pay for the digger, and the seller was reimbursed for auction costs. The Kobelco digger is up for auction again. This time, let's hope that an adult gets there first.

And the Moral of this Story is - - -

"...Perhaps it’s a lesson for many parents or childminders to keep a close eye on little ones around computers."

Yep, I'd say that's a good idea.

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Facebook: Indignation, Righteous or Not, Gets Results

"Facebook Does About-Face on Privacy Change"
The Wall Street Journal (February 18, 2009)

"Yielding to pressure from its users and privacy advocates, Facebook Inc. Tuesday night backed away from controversial changes to its terms of use that some had decried as giving the social network too much leeway with users' personal information.

"Just a day after standing by the revisions, the company said it would scrap the new policy and return to its previous terms of service in a notice to its 175 million users on its Web site.

" 'Over the past couple of days, we have received a lot of questions and comments about these updated terms and what they mean for people and their information,' read the statement, which Facebook Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg expanded upon in a blog post. 'Because of the feedback we received, we have decided to return to our previous Terms of Use while we resolve the issues that people have raised.'..."

Mark Zuckerberg's blog post:
"Update on Terms"
The Facebook Blog (February 17, 2009)

"A couple of weeks ago, we revised our terms of use hoping to clarify some parts for our users. Over the past couple of days, we received a lot of questions and comments about the changes and what they mean for people and their information. Based on this feedback, we have decided to return to our previous terms of use while we resolve the issues that people have raised.

"Many of us at Facebook spent most of today discussing how best to move forward...."

US News and World Report's Katy Marquardt's blog post:
"The Consumerist Gives the Scoop on Facebook Privacy Snafu"
New Money blog, US News and World Report (February 18, 2009)

"If you've logged into Facebook recently, you may have noticed a peculiar "Terms of Use" update at the top of your home page. It essentially says that due to user feedback over the past couple of weeks, the social networking site will return to its previous terms of use.

"Like me, you may wonder what the previous terms of use contained.

"Here's the scoop, courtesy of the Consumerist blog, which initially broke the story thanks to a reader tip:..."

The blog post has several more links, including "10 Facebook Privacy Settings to Know".

And the Moral of the Story is: Think Before You Leap

It looks like Facebook is going to change its TOS anyway: but next time, they'll take their clients into account - and remember that this is the Information Age.

Facts have a way of getting published, now, even if The New York Times doesn't print them.

A favorite online community of mine (BlogCatalog.com) made a set of policy changes a while ago. But BlogCatalog put the changes up for discussion, before enacting them.

Smart move, I think: Took some of the decision-making load off BlogCatalog's staff, and let people in the online community have a hand in crafting the new rules. Pretty close to a win-win situation.

Anyway: Facebook got a dunking in the real world; they'll probably be more careful next time around; and we have another example of how a lot of indignant people can make a difference.

Thursday, February 5, 2009

Make Your Own Fonts with YourFonts - Free?!

"Turn Handwriting into a Font with YourFont"
Drawn! (February 2, 2009)

"YourFont is a free, web-based program that allows you to turn your handwriting into a font. Basically, all you have to do is:..."


(from Drawn!, used without permission)

Looks too good to be true: free? YourFonts' TOS is fairly short and straightforward.

My guess is that YourFonts is establishing a name for itself, by offering its services free - and that there'll be a non-free version around after word gets around. Or, it could be a way for YourFonts' parent company to keep its name in front of people. Or, maybe YourFonts is run by people who like to perform services for free.

More, at "
Turn Your Handwriting Into Fonts: YourFonts
" (Cool Creation (February 3, 2009)), "PRODUCT WATCH" (Law Practice magazine, PRACTICE DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL ISSUE: BRANDING YOURSELF ONLINE (January/February 2009)), and about 97,700 other places online.

Finally, has anybody used YourFonts? If so, how did you like it.

Saturday, January 31, 2009

Getting Paid to Write: Not the Worst Idea in the World

"10 Online Publishers That Want To Pay You to Write"
Bukisa (January 24, 2009)

"The Internet has made it possible for ordinary people like yourself to write and make money from the very thing that you already enjoy doing. Webmasters are consistently on the lookout to partner with eager writers that desire to share their passions with other people around the world. Most smart webmasters have already learned that in order to attract and maintain a healthy population of amazing authors is to share the ad revenue or just pay them well for their services.

"Personally, I have always enjoyed writing and...."

First: a disclaimer.

I haven't researched Bukisa, or any of the outfits listed. They all look fine, but that doesn't mean that I endorse them.

In fact, I'd appreciate comments from people who do have knowledge or experience with places like Triond and MatrixMails.

The idea of getting paid to write isn't new, to put it mildly. And, it looks it's catching on, on the Internet.

Saturday, December 13, 2008

A Heirarchy of the Beards

"Heirarchy of the Beards"

It's an 18 inch by 24" poster, available on wondermark.com, which is also an online comic. Or, as the site puts it, an "illustrated jocularity."

The classification of beards goes from "flapwings," "claus-esque" and "chin-muffler" at the top to a half-dozen at the bottom that include "brillo brush," "bunny-down," and "patchy McGee." Between, there's a wide range, including "wilted cigar" and "soup-saver."

I found the poster, in the website's store, under (what else?) Posters.

Tuesday, August 12, 2008

A Glass Studio's Website: Beautiful

Mark Ditzler Glass Studio, LLC

"Artisan glass created by Mark Ditzler incorporates beautiful irridized or dichroic coatings, which cause the glittering, shimmering reflections of light. Many special steps combine to make his glass work unique and provide special interest and lasting value to the collector."

Beautiful photos display the glass art.

Ditzler creates sinks, lighting, walls, Countertops. And something that's new to me: glass house numbers.

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Lots of Modern Furniture

"Modern Furniture | Contemporary Furniture | Designer Modern Furniture"
ERoomService

Photos of very odd-looking furniture, some of which might be practical or comfortable, all of which is terribly Modern.

Many of the pieces actually look rather attractive.

Monday, July 14, 2008

Fifties Music: Links to Amazon Products as a Blog

The Best 50s Music

"My favorite albums and songs of the 50s. 50s dance, pop, rock, and other genres of 50s music. 50s MP3s, music CDs, and DVDs you can buy."

Today's post: "Chuck Berry - The Definitive Collection " (July 14, 2008).

"This is great 50s and 60s rock music by Chuck Berry. My favorite 50s songs are "Johnny B. Goode", "Rock And Roll Music", and "Maybellene". Other songs I like are "Thirty Days", "You Can't Catch Me", "Too Much Monkey Business"...."

This blogger has the same general idea I had, with "Apathetic Lemming of the North."

Except he's more focused (wouldn't take much), and links to Amazon products.

Promising, I'd say, for people who like music of the fifties. Right now, the posts don't tell you much more than which songs are the blogger's favorites in a collection, but more detailed reviews may be coming.

Sunday, July 6, 2008

Polish Glassware Commercial Blog: Pretty Good Design

"Dom itp - European Houseware Blog"

This is one of those blogs that's designed to show of a retail store's products. In this case, a chain of retail stores. For an outfit that's presenting a somewhat pricey product, this is a good design.

What I particularly noticed was how clean the design was. Quite a few artsy (excuse me, 'creative') businesses jazz up their Web presence with cool colors and eye-catching design elements. Great idea, if the place is in the Web design business. Otherwise, all that creative stuff is, IMO, a distraction for the visitor.

Dom itp's blog has the title, with the company logo, a column of text-and-photos posts, a sidebar with navigation and contact information, a footer, and that's about it.

The background: white. Text: black.

Simple. Elegant. Directs attention to the equally simple product photos.

Knew I'd forgotten something. The stores sell very nice glassware. From the "About" page:

"Dom itp - European Houseware is a chain of retail stores located in the Chicago area. Dom itp specializes in importing high-end products from Poland. At our stores you will find handmade Polish colored glassware, authentic Polish porcelain dinnerware, Boleslawiec stoneware, Polish meat grinders, Polish bakeware, Polish cookware utensils, Polish Christmas ornaments, Chicago Christmas ornaments, and the famous electric potato grater...."

Sunday, June 29, 2008

And Now, for Something Completely Different:
A Novel about Space Battles, Fearsome Dinosaurs, Middle School Teen Angst, and More

"Home > Spanish Language Educational Materials > SECRETS OF THE SURVIVORS (paperback), a novel by Mark L. Eastburn"
aprenden.com

This is a page from an online catalog. The book sounds a bit florid, but interesting.

"Product Description
SECRETS OF THE SURVIVORS (paperback), a novel by Mark L. Eastburn
A great book for adventure lovers of all ages!


"Epic Space Battles! Fearsome Dinosaurs! Middle School Teen Angst! Elementary School Squabbles! Brazilian Martial Arts! Courageous Frogs! It's All In There!...

"...An explanation of the price: It may seem a little high, but this is a limited edition, 400 page book. It may quickly rise in value as the book gains in popularity, and we will keep a record of each purchase to prove that each signed copy that you buy is authentic!"

(There you go, DrBurst.)
Unique, innovative candles

Visit us online:
Spiral Light Candle  • Find a Retailer
• Spiral Light Candle online store

Pinterest: From the Man Behind the Lemming

Top 10 Most-Viewed Posts

Today's News! Some of it, anyway

Actually, some of yesterday's news may be here. Or maybe last week's.
The software and science stuff might still be interesting, though. Or not.
The Lemming thinks it's interesting: Your experience may vary.
("Following" list moved here, after Blogger changed formats)

Who Follows the Lemming?

WebSTAT

Family Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory