Comparing today's "splog" discussion with what I came up with in July ("Sploggers: Intellectual Property Thieves (July 28, 2007)), the term "splog" may be one that's evolving rapidly.
For bloggers who don't want to offend, it's a good discussion to read.
Related posts on Apathetic Lemming of the North:
- Return of the Sploggers
(September 5, 2007) - "All the Myriad Ways" - Tribute or Violation?
(September 4, 2007) - Stealing Intellectual Property Isn't Nice
(August 29, 2007) - Mis-Matched and Unattributed: Double Whammy for These Blog Posts
(August 26, 2007) - Intellectual Property Rights: A Borderline Post?
(August 22, 2007) - Intellectual Property Violation: What to Do
(August 15, 2007) - Intellectual Property Violation: This Time With Laughs
(August 10, 2007) - Copyright Material Ripped Off? You're not alone.
(August 9, 2007) - Plagiarism-Finder Site: Copyscape
(August 9, 2007) - Another Abuse of Copyright: If This Isn't Illegal, it Should Be!
(August 9, 2007) - Copyright: a List You Shouldn't Myth
(August 8, 2007) - Copy, Steal, Rob, Whatever: Another Violation of Intellectual Property Rights
(August 3, 2007) - Copyright Infringement, YouTube, and Video Sharing
(July 28, 2007) - Sploggers: Intellectual Property Thieves
(July 28, 2007)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your comment!